I thought that the legal system worked on precedent. That is how the legal system provides consistency.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]>wrote: > Axil, that's not how the legal system works. There are no "cold fusion > laws". > > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Just one legal case dealing will cold fusion please, just one. >> >> >> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Axil, if you lie to someone that something does something it doesn't >>> work so they give you money, that's Fraud. >>> >>> You can use a dictionary, if you like. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> To support your opinion, please provide legal precedent pursuant to >>>> pink unicorn fairy dust or cold fusion: just one please. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The subject matter is meaningless. The subject could be pink unicorn >>>>> fairy dust. >>>>> >>>>> What matters if money changed hands over misrepresentation. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> At this juncture, cold fusion is not a subject where the words " >>>>>> criminal statute", fraud, NDA, jail, and "illegal actions" apply. When a >>>>>> valid patent is granted and the field of cold fusion becomes generally >>>>>> accepted in the real world, then DGT might well fell it legally possible >>>>>> to >>>>>> bring Gamberale to account. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Interesting point, Jed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I wonder if this is why DGT is reluctant to sue him, because Luca >>>>>>> would have to prove himself by saying that DGT was fraudulent and they >>>>>>> don't want to have to defend against that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected] >>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The problem with busting your NDA so openly is that it's going to >>>>>>>>> be impossible to get anyone to trust you again. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As I pointed out elsewhere, if Gamberale had not "busted his NDA >>>>>>>> openly," warned the customers, and closed down the company, he could >>>>>>>> end up >>>>>>>> in jail. Defkalion cannot enforce an NDA that calls for the person >>>>>>>> under >>>>>>>> that NDA to commit fraud. You cannot abide by an NDA contract that >>>>>>>> calls >>>>>>>> for illegal actions. Defkalion cannot enforce that, or sue for breach >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> contract. You cannot sue someone in civil court because they refused to >>>>>>>> violate a criminal statute. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It may be difficult for Gamberale to get anyone to trust him now, >>>>>>>> but if he had continued it would have impossible for him to get the >>>>>>>> police >>>>>>>> to believe him, which is a far worse predicament. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is real life. You cannot go around trying to sell non-working >>>>>>>> machines for millions of dollars. People who have millions of dollars >>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>> definitely go to the authorities when they find out you have robbed >>>>>>>> them. >>>>>>>> This is not like selling fake Rolex watches from a suitcase on >>>>>>>> Broadway. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
