The amount of time and mental enegy required to absorb Mills technology is very substantial. Is it real or is it a fantasy? Who can be a judge? The perspective student of this course of study must be convinced that this substantial effort is not made in vain.
BLP is like a company who has not made a profit in 20 years. An investor must see some upturn in the prospects of BLP before he makes an investment in that endeavor. When Mills puts an energy device in service so that his technology replaces the oil and gas industry, then many people will decide to make the investment in Mills technology. The same is true for all the developers of unconventional energy generation. The first few of these developers who successfully field a technology verified by a vigorous market for their product will generate all the interest required to drive forward the new paradigm. Success is the key to everything. On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Mike Carrell <[email protected]> wrote: > I have posted to Vo and CNMS a series of notes under the general heading > of ‘understanding BLP’ which have been generally ignored. The post below > illustrates a basic problem, that these commentators have simply not done > their homework well enough to evaluate what is really going on and the > difficulties that Mills has faced for decades in finding a commercially > viable device or system to utilize his discoveries. Without the homework, > the claims and demonstrations will be misunderstood. I have followed Mills > for decades and am willing to enter a dialogue with anyone who really wants > to understand. There is a “society for Classical Physics”, moderated by Dr. > John Farrell, an early mentor and associate of Mills. Mills actively > participates in the discussion with terse comments and references to his > published work. I am gratified by the quality of the questions asked, and > Mills’ courteous replies. Basically, he is proceeding in incremental steps > toward the device now portrayed in the website. Much depends on exactly > what happens in the detonation, which will be found by careful experiment > which is seen the video clips. There will be technical papers posted at > appropriate intervals, as Mills has done for decades. > > Mike Carrell > > > > *From:* Foks0904 . [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:54 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:BlackLight's Second Test of Automated Ignition System > > > > I've never thought Mills is running a confidence game. But I've been > critical of BLP because it's perplexing as hell why they have had > such issues getting into the public marketplace for over twenty years. They > have had issues with patent office in past, etc. but I don't know how far > railroading goes in explaining it. I've speculated perhaps they are > contracting out their devices with non-consumer partners or something, but > then why bother w/ public demos and videos like this? Shrug. > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> > wrote: > > What I don't get is how this footage would impress anyone. Perhaps my > lack of appreciation is due to my lack of knowledge. No doubt if you're an > expert at microcalorimetry and allied fields, you would know, on the basis > of your extensive experience, merely from seeing and hearing this footage, > that they are competent people and really have something and are not trying > to play a confidence game. > > > > Eric > > > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vh88aVr6i8&feature=youtu.be > > > > R. Mills is answering questions > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T. > Department. >
