I agree.. Conclusion? Lenart On May 29, 2014 9:11 PM, "Axil Axil" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The amount of time and mental enegy required to absorb Mills technology is > very substantial. Is it real or is it a fantasy? Who can be a judge? The > perspective student of this course of study must be convinced that this > substantial effort is not made in vain. > > BLP is like a company who has not made a profit in 20 years. An investor > must see some upturn in the prospects of BLP before he makes an investment > in that endeavor. > > When Mills puts an energy device in service so that his technology > replaces the oil and gas industry, then many people will decide to make the > investment in Mills technology. > The same is true for all the developers of unconventional energy > generation. The first few of these developers who successfully field a > technology verified by a vigorous market for their product will generate > all the interest required to drive forward the new paradigm. > > Success is the key to everything. > > > > > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Mike Carrell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I have posted to Vo and CNMS a series of notes under the general heading >> of ‘understanding BLP’ which have been generally ignored. The post below >> illustrates a basic problem, that these commentators have simply not done >> their homework well enough to evaluate what is really going on and the >> difficulties that Mills has faced for decades in finding a commercially >> viable device or system to utilize his discoveries. Without the homework, >> the claims and demonstrations will be misunderstood. I have followed Mills >> for decades and am willing to enter a dialogue with anyone who really wants >> to understand. There is a “society for Classical Physics”, moderated by Dr. >> John Farrell, an early mentor and associate of Mills. Mills actively >> participates in the discussion with terse comments and references to his >> published work. I am gratified by the quality of the questions asked, and >> Mills’ courteous replies. Basically, he is proceeding in incremental steps >> toward the device now portrayed in the website. Much depends on exactly >> what happens in the detonation, which will be found by careful experiment >> which is seen the video clips. There will be technical papers posted at >> appropriate intervals, as Mills has done for decades. >> >> Mike Carrell >> >> >> >> *From:* Foks0904 . [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:54 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:BlackLight's Second Test of Automated Ignition System >> >> >> >> I've never thought Mills is running a confidence game. But I've been >> critical of BLP because it's perplexing as hell why they have had >> such issues getting into the public marketplace for over twenty years. They >> have had issues with patent office in past, etc. but I don't know how far >> railroading goes in explaining it. I've speculated perhaps they are >> contracting out their devices with non-consumer partners or something, but >> then why bother w/ public demos and videos like this? Shrug. >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> What I don't get is how this footage would impress anyone. Perhaps my >> lack of appreciation is due to my lack of knowledge. No doubt if you're an >> expert at microcalorimetry and allied fields, you would know, on the basis >> of your extensive experience, merely from seeing and hearing this footage, >> that they are competent people and really have something and are not trying >> to play a confidence game. >> >> >> >> Eric >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vh88aVr6i8&feature=youtu.be >> >> >> >> R. Mills is answering questions >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________________________________________________ >> This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T. >> Department. >> > >
