On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Whenever you see some idiot standing on a bully pulpit in media,
>> government and/or academia and saying "Who could have foreseen?"  You can
>> bet someone did foresee it and not just because a broken clock is right
>> twice a day.
>
>
> Yes, indeed.
>
> The Three Mile Island disaster was foretold, as I wrote earlier. The
> engineer who did field inspections reported that the same events had
> happened in other plants of this design, and that if it happened under full
> load the results might be disastrous.
>
> That is one example. There is a similar one that makes me feel sorry for
> regulators and field engineers. After Fukushima, someone found a report
> buried in the files saying: "There is historical evidence of high tsunamis
> in this area, so we should build up the sea wall in this reactor complex,
> and take other steps to avoid a catastrophe from a tsunami."
>
> In other words, Fukushima was a disaster foretold, just as Three Mile Island
> was. A reporter asked a Japanese official about this. The official responded
> with a bout of honesty that I suppose was induced by months of overwork and
> worry. He said something like: "You can always find a report predicting a
> disaster. Any disaster. We look at every scenario. We have experts in every
> field look into anything imaginable. The thing is, if you were to turn off a
> reactor until every possible scenario is covered, you would never turn it
> on." That was prophetic. Soon after that, they turned off nearly every
> Japanese nuke, and most are still off.
>
>
> Risk can never be fully eliminated. Ordinary members of the public have
> difficulty understanding this, but engineers know it. People get upset when
> airplanes crash or factories burn down. Sometimes they are justified in
> getting upset, such when a factory has a terrible safety record. Other
> times, people should simply accept that risk is inevitable despite our best
> efforts.

How do you view the decision to not build a higher sea wall?
Was it an acceptable cost vs risk tradeoff or a criminal mistake?

Harry

Reply via email to