Kevin:
Think about these clues: 1) At this time, noone has indicated that Blaze has taken any of their $. I doubt that anyone has even bothered to offer, except you, of course. Why do you suppose that is? 2) You stated, “***Then WTF are you doing on such a thread where that is the point of the discussion?” Clue#1 implies that the vast majority of Vorts are NOT interested in its probability of being real. In fact, those who have done their homework are pretty much convinced that it *IS* real (i.e., probability=1.0, or close to it), so discussing the probability of it being real is pretty much a waste of time. 3) Given #2, it should be obvious that the MAIN purpose of this discussion group, at least as far as LENR is concerned, is the SCIENCE, not whether its real or not. I’m here for the same reason that most Vorts are here, which is to discuss the SCIENCE; to try to connect the dots... You wrote: “… you choose some peripheral waste-of-time bullshit issue to focus on, rather than the original subject of the thread” You might think that how we treat each other is a ‘peripheral waste-of-time bullshit’ issue, but I, and I would wager most other Vorts, think that it’s an important issue… or, in all your ranting and raving did you forget my whole point which was to simply ask you to leave out any personal derogatory statements? If you want to continue to engage Blaze on the topic of wagering on LENR, knock yourself out, but Blaze has also contributed to discussions on the science of LENR, so treat him in a civil manner… is that too much to ask? -Mark Iverson From: Kevin O'Malley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 8:09 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Swedish Professors Chomping at the Bit On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 7:22 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <[email protected]> wrote: All Vorts: Have any of you lost money to Blaze, or even took him up on a bet??? ***Yes. I did. I took him up on his bet immediately when he offered 10:1 odds, and then he quickly backtracked, citing (insert some favorite bullshit here) that there had been "news" in the meantime that changed his mind. There had been ZERO news. The only thing happening in LENR at that time was that I was schooling him. Kevin: Perhaps you need to go back and read the rules regarding vortex postings… ***Mark: Perhaps you need to "get a clue". If pointing out that Blaze needs a Cephalorectomy, then you just kicked Jed and others off this board. Do you really want to do that? I have no desire to debate probabilities of LENR/Rossi being real… ***Then WTF are you doing on such a thread where that is the point of the discussion? it’s a waste of time as far as I’m concerned, and I would guess that most here feel the same, ***But it doesn't stop you from logging onto such a thread. So you've logged onto a thread that you consider to be a waste of time so that you don't comment on the subject of the thread but you choose some peripheral waste-of-time bullshit issue to focus on, rather than the original subject of the thread. Talk about wasting time. You appear to be professional at it. since you and Blaze seem to be the only ones who contribute to that topic... I think it’s you who needs to ‘get a clue’. -m ***I have the clue, you don't. For instance, why don't you post to Blaze that you're prepared to take him up on his offer of 40%? So that means you put $40 down for Blaze to match with $60, to make $100 that will be donated to a LENR-honorable organization such as MFMP or LENR-CANR.org. For grins, you can say that "Rossi being real" will be measured by the vote of vorticians within 10 days of the receipt of the TIP report we all anticipate. If Vorticians vote that it is a positive for Rossi, then Rossi Is Real. If Vorticians vote that it is a negative for Rossi, then Rossi is a scam artist or something else. Let us see how Blaze squirms off that deal, which is far from the 10:1 odds originally offered with a $5000 pot. Or is all this stuff a buncha waste-of-time bullshit that a nanny-state intervener such as yourself would consider to be "below him"? From: Kevin O'Malley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 7:51 AM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Swedish Professors Chomping at the Bit If Bill wants to beg to differ, let him. It's his sandbox. In the meantime your free advice is worth what I paid for it. If you don't like the implication that Blaze has his head in dark places, go ahead and defend him from such an ugly onslaught of horrible personal attacks that you'd invoke the name of the High One. You''re the one trying to act like the parent here. Or perhaps you could spend your time *actually* commenting on the *actual* subject at hand. After all, that is one of my objections to Blaze on his *own* thread. On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:17 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <[email protected]> wrote: All here are smart enough to determine for themselves whether or not they want to part with their $... don’t need you to act like our parent; our govt does enough of that already. I think your interaction with him has been MORE than enough warning to all Vorts, and, you can still engage him, just don’t imply he’s got his head in dark places. >“The "rules" bend under such circumstances.” I think Bill B. would beg to differ… you can still ‘warn’ us clueless idiots if you really feel compelled to do so, just lay off the personal attacks… its really pretty simple. -Mark From: Kevin O'Malley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 10:17 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Swedish Professors Chomping at the Bit On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:45 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <[email protected]> wrote: Kevin, Lighten up. ***NO. Ever since Blaze first showed up, he's been trying to steal money from your pocket and every other vortician's pocket. http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg83682.html He even admits to wanting to take your money. http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg93969.html The "rules" bend under such circumstances. "Lighten up" becomes "Get a clue".
