On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
That Wiki “report” sounds fishy to me. I sounds like hearsay. > I agree. One link in the Wikipedia article that talked about isotopes was to Ethan Seigel's sloppy piece attempting to discredit the E-Cat, and the other was to a broken link. I do not recall having seen a definitive analysis of the isotopes from the 2011 test yet. I have seen a number of Rossi's statements to the effect that there was significant transmutation to copper (Gary Wright collects a bunch of them). In addition, an assay that produced natural ratios would not mean much without further context to understand what happened prior to the assay. There's few solid details to work with, and any confidence in one's conclusions is misplaced. Eric
