What would happen if the vacuum that a Rydberg crystal of hydrogen was occupying turned into a soup of magically catalyzed pions? This sort of thing happens in a quark plasma.
This happened just after the big bang and the QGP condenced into elements that were what we see today in the universe. There would be a preponderance of double magic elements as described by Dr Hora amd Miley See https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg86917.html On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ny Teknik: What results have you obtained from the > analyses? > Kullander: … the used powder is different > in > that several elements are present, mainly 10 percent copper and 11 percent > iron. The isotopic analysis through ICP-MS doesn’t show any deviation from > the natural isotopic composition of nickel and copper. > Think about it. Isn’t it absolutely impossible for this to > be fusion? > Nickel has 5 isotopes and copper 2. If the ratio stays the > same in both then exactly 10% of every nickel isotope is consumed and > converted into the two copper isotopes, which also stay in the exact same > natural ratio … but oops ! … that cannot happen since over 2/3 of Ni is 58 > and 2/3 of copper is 63. This would mean that in most cases 5 protons must > also be fused into each nickel atom (at the exact same time) and then 4 of > them must undergo EC (at the exact same time) to form the required > neutrons… > and so on. Bizarre. > Not in this Universe :-) > OK. In all fairness, if an observer was such a devoted fan of Rossi that > they felt compelled to make a case for the nucleons (balancing out) in some > kind of weird and wonderful new reaction … and given that Kullander did not > say that the iron was seen in a natural ratio… well… in that case, one > could > imagine that if a proton and two Ni-58 nuclei went into some kind of novel > nucleon exchange reaction, then it could work out to give results which at > least were not as laughable as the above. > This would assume that almost all of the iron found was Fe-54. They are > silent on that. > If that were the case, the iron anomaly would itself be a nice little > secret > for Kullander to hold onto. We can be pretty sure this was not the case, > but > just for laughs… consider… > Two Ni-58 plus a proton is 117 nucleons; and so is one Cu-63 plus one > Fe-54. > That is a rough balance …but of course, it is the tip of a deep iceberg. > The > implication is that some kind of musical-chairs shuffle of nucleons is > possible. Maybe it is Higgs-mediated :-) > What is a nucleon exchange reaction? Well, this is actually not unheard of, > and the Oppenheimer-Phillips reaction is the simple version. It takes a lot > of imagination to go any further than that, but there are a few papers out > there… > > > > >
