Or another possibility: some men in black suits and mirror shades told
them "you can't publish this as written, matter of National, NATO, EU,
World security, top secret ( pick one or more). We will tell you what
you can say, and when, or else...and don't tell Rossi we were here".
That's how it would go in the novel anyway.
AlanG
On 6/21/2014 9:32 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote:
let us imagine the unimaginable...
It work.
now, the swedish scientist have measured heat... positive.
they re mesure... delay...positive...
impossible.
so the look for nuclear ashes... delay...
interesting but uncmmon...
they remeasure... delay...
they prepare a paper a report...
since it is impossible all the review ask for more... delays...
new cross checking, DC ofset , alien conspiracy, inverted swpped
clamps, complicities, russian KGB, NSA manipulation... many things to
chech, thus delays...
the testers are accused by swedish public radio, by DoE, by INFN, APS,
CEA, SciAm, AAAA, La Recherche, nature, Science, to be accomplice, to
be scammer, deluded, ...
so they rewrite the paper with more check, ... delays...
now imagine it does not work because Rossi is deluded
the tester makes a test
it does not work
they ask him to explain...
he cannot...
they test another reactor...
it does not work...
they recheck.. nothing to say...
rossi's moan that the measurement is wrong...
they recheck...
after 3 weeks the scientist are convinced the 3 reactors are borke...
they write a paper...
rossi ask for correction.
they do the minimum. 2 weeks.
they publish the paper, warn Elforsk to stop defending that technology.
end of the story
Now imagine rossi try to fool them (how? with pu238? with inverted
clamps ? with DC ?)
they launche the test, after few minustes, hours, days they make a
cross check, see something strange, re check, have an hypothesis, test
its, understand the trick, reproduce it... 3 weeks, they write a report...
Rossi moan, they don't hear him, and tell to the planet rossi is a
scammer...
now what have happened ? in which world are we ?
we are in the world where:
- the heat is big enough to justify the test continuation
- rossi reactor works for >4 month (or they would have used another of
their spare reactor) without breakdown (it can have faded however)
- the scientist are very skeptic in the positive meaning (they want
more evidences)
- they scientist make many cross check, including isotopic analysis...
(for proving nuclear nature or even for proposing a Nobel theory paper)
Hey guys, imagine that those physicist prepare a paper for the Nobel...
maybe you are right Kevin, scientist are using that time for their own
interest ... to make a Nobel paper. at least to save their butt from
the SR radio and S Coyaud rascals.
2014-06-21 17:51 GMT+02:00 Jones Beene <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
Sorry to sound like that scratched record myself - as I see others
have said
the same thing.
Steven,
Yes ... and there could be a third and more important inescapable
conclusion.
You do not delay a report for an isotopic analysis if there has
been no
excess heat ! You simply issue a negative report.
IOW if the report was indeed delayed for this reason, it is a
slam-dunk that
they have seen excess heat.
From: Orionworks -
Jones sez:
> ... sounding like a scratched vinyl record
Perhaps so. However I'm inclined to speculate that two inescapable
conclusions have been drawn:
(1) Spurious anomalous heat continues to be recorded.
(2) They can not accurately predict and/or control the generation of
spurious anomalous heat.
When it comes to conducting scientific investigations where highly
controversial claims of anomalous heat have been alleged, precise AND
PREDICTABLE calorimetric data must be recorded repeatedly. The
unpredictability of the heat measurements - I could see how this
is likely
to drive a lot of researchers who have had had little or no
exposure to the
LENR field, up the wall. By nature most of these researchers are
going to be
pre-disposed to assume that a measurement mistake had been made. I
suspect
many are baffled that they have not found such a definitive
mistake. It
sticks in their craw. Combine this with the likely fact that the
recorded
data is often unpredictable. Such unpredictability is likely feed
off of
their suspicions that something is just not right here. It
continues to
breed a sense that a lack of proper scientific control is the most
likely
explanation.
So... what do you do? Call in more troops and advisors. Prepare to
conduct
another "surge" test in a final attempt to root out what is
assumed to be
pesky insurgency of bad "elements" that they haven't been able to
eliminate.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.orionworks.com <http://svjart.orionworks.com>
zazzle.com/orionworks <http://zazzle.com/orionworks>
