Ahmen Axil :) On Jun 21, 2014 8:32 PM, "Axil Axil" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I believe that LENR is many centuries ahead of its time. Let us understand > this paradigm changing device through an like example. > > > > Let us put ourselves back to the year 1014 AD. Imagine that a smart phone > was given to a monk who toiled for most of his cloistered life coping one > book and you told him to prove that with this device he could now copy and > sent that book to someone across the world in 5 seconds. Even this monk who > accepts the concept of miracles might be somewhat confused and call in > some additional members of his order to help him with the test. > > > > When looking more deeply into the physical principles that make this smart > phone work, the monk and his fellows might need some additional time to > research new physical concepts in more depth than their collective > knowledge base may be expected to support. This could take some additional > time. > > > > > > Maybe the time it takes this monk and his fellows to test the smart phone > would extent a longer than was originally expected. After all they are > dealing with understanding a miracle. > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello Kevin, >> No Swedes are not immune to any bad things. I was hesitating before I >> wrote my post as I could hear that protest. However, it is a small and >> homogeneous country where the head of (the CIA of Sweden) is forced to >> explain himself. He is criticized for having collaborated with the US >> intelligence (CIA) and he says "I am sorry" on national TV. BTW I have >> said that smaller entities are easier to handle than larger.:) >> >> Of course lies exist. It is a great country to be a journalist as you >> have so much access. The people we talk about would not take any chances. >> They for certain are not entrepreneurial or risk takers in any form or >> shape. >> >> I am saying I believe - your opinion is as good as mine just my believe - >> that there is a conflict between people and that some say 'let us publish', >> while other say >> >> we get the question xyz- what are we saying. Conclusion let us find out >> and delay, which is better than showing an unprofessional behavior in the >> mind of those guys. >> >> I agree they did not sign up to answer the theory. However, I think they >> want to have theory that support the findings. It would be covering that >> special part we all are concerned about. To make another test to find out >> exactly how much CU and Fe and Ni that has been involved and the isotopes >> must be of value as I think they listen to you guys who are providing >> theories and ask questions all the time. Good of course but making the >> people involved feeling they need answers to the different ideas they did >> not answered before - and for which they found themselves without clear >> answers. You can say that given the situation it is bullshit behavior. OK I >> can see that point it does not change what I think and I do not know nor >> communicate with either one of them. >> >> Your insider idea is not possible, Yes, I agree that they should have >> lived up to their promises about timeline. However, I have been in many >> situations where you just cannot get anywhere by saying it is no good, when >> people say they need more time. They are in no hurry - but for the purpose >> of insider trading - no way. >> >> Sorry Kevin you need to meet with more people. They mostly protest about >> the missing pickles. Most often such issues take size not proportional to >> their roles in the whole - just look on our political debate. >> >> I understand that people are suffering from poor performance or lack of >> personal accountability for promises made. That does not change anything. I >> have often been in that situation when lack of decisions have cost me. I >> think most business leaders have been there. No fun I agree. I am not >> defending the lack of accountability - I merely tried to give you the >> internal reasons I think they have and combined with their environmental >> situation. It is still 3 out of 300 month - 1%. >> >> >
