On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi guys I am a Swede at least I lived there until 1988. > There are no black suits in Sweden. There are nobody informing friends to > make them rich. > ***Then are Swedes somehow immune to the human condition? It is a small and relatively homogeneous country no big lies survive for > long. > ***But they do exist. > I am absolutely sure that it is a combination of inconclusive result > ***What gives you the idea the result is inconclusive? The result is, by your standard, "absolutely sure" to be conclusive and hard to explain, otherwise they would have quickly published. > and lack of explanations that causes the delay. > ***They did not sign up to explain the results. No one has a handle on that after 25 years, it would be extreme hubris for them to expect they can do it in a matter of a few months. Their job is to produce the report and publish their results, not explain them. > I mentioned it is a small community (population of the bay area (San > Francisco). I am sure they are out double checking and searching for a > theory to support there findings > ***They knew GOING IN that there was a distinct possibility that Rossi's device was real. For them to hang their hats on that NOW and suggest they're hung up due to lack of theory is bullshit. > because it is very hard to repair a mistake or come back from having made > a mistake. > ***They had 6 MONTHS. If they're worried about a mistake, get Rossi's permission to publish at 3 months and then again at 7 months when all the feedback comes in about where they might have screwed up. I'm no PhD and I can do that. What is their friggin problem? It leads one to believe that human nature is at work, including the insider trading innuendo. > Yes, I am disappointed as well. However, I have been dealing with similar > situations and I know that nobody want to risk their reputation. > ***They KNEW about this possibility GOING IN. > Victory would be a full understanding. > ***Defining victory at this point is an attempt to define the terms. Chinese proberb says "he who defines the terms wins the argument". But these guys knew the terms GOING IN. To report a result from a hit and miss performance and then be proven to > have failed in basic scientific procedure would be losing ones reputation > for good. > ***That is what they signed up for, and why they were given the extra several months. Hanging their hats on that now is like saying you don't wanna pay for the hamburger you already ate because it shoulda had 2 pickles instead of just 1. > Those guys know what happened to P and F. > BTW what is 3 month after 25 years? > ***Based upon publicly available information, 3 months is life or death for Cyclone Power CYPW that needs this report to be generated. Public information, public comments, public results. That means that if CYPW fails, these guys are opening themselves to a public lawsuit.
