Interesting. I found that conference site... maybe some may find interesting documents http://www.quodons.webs.upv.es/
2014-06-28 20:44 GMT+02:00 Alan Fletcher <a...@well.com>: > > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Alain Sepeda" <alain.sep...@gmail.com> > *Sent: *Saturday, June 28, 2014 3:16:16 AM > *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:dancing the proper dance > > > can some physicist , staying in known quantum physics (no new physics > please), can tell me the various collective mechanism, pseudo-particles, > that can appear at KeV/MeV scale? > > It seems nuclei are a bit insulated in their atom, except when impacted > ... > > F.M. Russell, the discoverer (Long, interesting story) of quodons, a form > of 2-dimensional moving discrete breather, indicates that an individual > atom participating in it will have an energy in the range of 100eV. But > the effective temperature is of the order of 10^5K --- so you have a > hotspot travelling through a lattice at 1/2 the speed of sound, without > attenuation --- so the actual probability of a d-d (or h-h) fusion > collision is quite high. > > Dubinko in his "novel" discrete breather paper > http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg94276.html quotes one > Russell paper, but not the one in which he discusses LANF (as he calls it). > > https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CDkQFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F228853378_Persistent_mobile_lattice_excitations_in_a_crystalline_insulator%2Ffile%2Fd912f50aa2c03b5ec4.pdf&ei=twmvU86HJZL6oATI54CAAQ&usg=AFQjCNF4zyFBul8t5GjJNuXGqsKCMVIsjA&sig2=TPPAvYJP5-xuZApip4y7bw > > or google > > PERSISTENT MOBILE LATTICE EXCITATIONS IN A CRYSTALLINE INSULATOR F. M. > Russell and J. C. Eilbeck > > (This is a draft -- I think it was published in 2003). > > > [cites] LANF was proposed in 2002 by F. M. Russell in private discussions > with J. C. Eilbeck. Patent > applications were filed on 2/05/2005 at the UK Pat. Office. > > > Both of these are much later than Ahern's 1993 "anharmonic" patent. > > > >
