I was referring to a peer-review of the tests sponsored by ELFORSK, which is somewhat different from a review of Rossi's own work. However, I agree it is related, and it would be difficult to peer-review. Also, a journal such as *Nature* would never allow a report of a black-box test such as this. ***Jed, earlier you said that submitting a peer reviewable report was a fool's errand. Do you think these dilly-dallying professors have engaged in such a fool's errand?
- [Vo]:Why professors are often late Jed Rothwell
- RE: [Vo]:Why professors are often late Jones Beene
- Re: [Vo]:Why professors are often late Peter Gluck
- Re: [Vo]:Why professors are often late Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Why professors are often late Axil Axil
- Re: [Vo]:Why professors are often late Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Why professors are often l... Kevin O'Malley
- Re: [Vo]:Why professors are oft... Lennart Thornros
- Re: [Vo]:Why professors are... Kevin O'Malley
- Re: [Vo]:Why professors are... Lennart Thornros
- Re: [Vo]:Why professors are... John Berry
- Re: [Vo]:Why professors are oft... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Why professors are often late Peter Gluck
- Re: [Vo]:Why professors are often late Kevin O'Malley
- Re: [Vo]:Why professors are often late Lennart Thornros
- Re: [Vo]:Why professors are often late Kevin O'Malley
- Re: [Vo]:Why professors are often late Lennart Thornros

