In terms of LENR. why is it important to have the spin of the nucleus affect the elections?
IMHO, the spin of the nucleus must be 0 for LENR to occur in that nucleus. Moving spin from the nucleus to the elections gains us nothing. On the other hand moving electron spin to the nucleus with an initial 0 spin(LENR can happen) will depress the LENR reaction in that nucleus( the spin is now no longer 0) which may be a valuable tool to dampen the LENR reaction. On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Aren’t you completely misinterpreting what this article states in trying >> to >> shoehorn it in LENR? >> > > The article does indeed talk about an effect of one or two electrons on > the spin of a nucleus (or nucleon), rather than the other way around. I'm > also going to guess that the amount of "torque" that can pass through this > system is weak, if an electron (or system of electrons) can affect the > nucleus. > > There were two or three places where it sounded like the effect might be > somewhat bidirectional, e.g.: "The optimization is related to an embedded > three-spin (electron-electron-nucleus) process that mutually flips the > coupled three spins under the energy conservation (mainly) of the Zeeman > interactions." The word "mutual" makes it sound like the spin of the > nucleus can have an effect on the spins of the two electrons. > > Eric > >
