I like much of your commentary, Eric.

 

I'm curious about one thing. What is it about Mills' orbitspheres that you 
don't like. Keep in mind I don't understand the math involved.

 

Will BLP succeed, or ultimately fail? I don't know.

 

We shall see. Hopefully sooner rather than later.

 

Regards,

Steven Vincent Johnson

svjart.orionworks.com

zazzle.com/orionworks

 

From: Eric Walker [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 9:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mills' Interview

 

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson 
<[email protected]> wrote:

Sadly, the CQM vs SQM debate, (and now possibly the LENR debate as well, if you 
get your way) is degenerating into a political battle to protect entrenched pet 
theories.


For me the motivation is a little different than protecting a pet theory 
(although I do admit to missing quantum mechanics every time I think about 
orbitspheres).  My reason for taking a less generous attitude towards BLP is a 
growing sense that they are aware that they have nothing to show and that they 
will have nothing to show in the medium term.  The main question I have doubts 
over is whether they believe they'll have something in the longer term; I'm 
becoming more and more skeptical, but I suppose this is possible.  That said, 
their operation is starting to take on the aspect of a confidence game.  I say 
this as someone who had no opinion of them three years ago.  There are people 
here who I am guessing have a financial stake with them.  I doubt they are 
aware of any malfeasance if it exists.  For those of you who strongly advocate 
for BLP, the company, rather than hydrinos, the concept, the thought will cross 
my mind that you are providing them with financial backing.  There are others 
who are just interested in seeing an underdog succeed, which is a different 
thing.

 

I respect Robin's predisposition towards hydrinos, so don't feel prepared to 
write them off altogether.  Talking about hydrinos is one thing, and tossing 
out the uncertainty principle is perhaps something else.  I find the latter 
idea a little fanciful, for with it goes some important results in physics.

 

Eric

 

Reply via email to