eernie1 July 7th, 2014 at 11:58 AM
Andrea, I have noticed that the bloggers on Vortex-l are discussing internal conversion through electron capture as a possible LENR producer. They seem to look for reactions involving deuterium rather than in the metals used in LENR. I would suggest they read further the work of Fermi(Beta decay), Gian-Carlo Wick, L. Alvarez and Hideki Yucawa. If they do not understand or believe the reaction ,this research may aid them. Andrea Rossi July 7th, 2014 at 2:15 PM Eernie1: I think electron capture is a wrong concept because it violates the leptons conservation law. I will, of course, be happy to say I am wrong as soon as I will be informed of substantial experimental evidence of it. So far, no trace of it I have been informed of. Warm Regards, A.R. On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Andrea Rossi > July 12th, 2014 at 9:30 PM > <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=853&cpage=3#comment-976992> > Todd Burkett: > We have made substantial investments to replicate ALL the experiments > reported in patents and publications. I repeat : ALL. I am sure that, at > least in some cases, we know those Technologies better than the inventors > themselves. We are taking LENR of our potential competitors very seriously > and I confrm what I answered to Giovanni Guerrini today. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > > Rossi and his crew must study the stuff in Jed's library heavily. > > > On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Andrea Rossi >> July 12th, 2014 at 5:04 PM >> <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=853&cpage=3#comment-976936> >> >> Giovanni Guerrini: >> >> I agree with you, but I am very worried of the wannabe competitors that >> now are presenting clowneries, like did Defkalion: they are very dangerous, >> because their failures will spray dirt on our work, as well as defkalion >> did: our enemies are eager to find another defkocones to say that all LENR >> world is a clownerie. Therefore I want to say sound and clear: we have >> replicated all the existing patents and know hows regarding the LENR >> existing in the world and no one of them has manifested a real heat excess >> with the following exceptions: Ikegami-Petterson system and Brian Ahern >> System. These are the only two systems that actually gave us evidence of a >> heat excess. All the other systems that we have reproduced ( and we have >> reproduced, with huge investments, all of the systems that have been >> proposed in all the world in the last 20 years, with particular attention >> on the experiments made in the last 4 years, that have been analyzed with >> extreme endeavour) have not given any heat excess evidence. One of them had >> put in the market a “kit” that has turned out to be a joke. I have to say >> this to make well clear that any future failure coming from all the >> burlesque reactors persented recently have nothing to do with our work and >> has not any right to cite our work as a reference without our explicit >> permission. >> >> I hope this has been understood sound and clear, because I have been >> strongly disturbed form all the insults I had to sustain after the >> clownerie of the def… has been put in evidence, even if I had said from the >> beginning that def… was a clownerie. Much before Others have put it in >> evidence. >> >> Warm Regards, >> A.R. >> > >
