Do we really need to go point-counterpoint on whether Axil is hard to understand at times? Axil aside, aren't we all? The only reason I brought it up is because pots shouldn't call tea kettles black. We all have to be a little more self-aware and not waste time with trivial pot-shots I think. These are complicated subjects we're dealing with most times. Differences in lexicons are going to exist. Lets deal with them more constructively.
If you find me opaque, /shrug. On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]> wrote: > >> OK. There's ALOT to respond to here, so let me do my best considering Ed >> is not here to talk for himself: >> >> Axil -- >> *It keeps the confusion level down. * >> >> ...For example, I think its fair to say that some of what you write and >> reference is highly opaque. >> > ***I agree, but perhaps you should respond where Axil is "opaque" > accordingly. Otherwise your own response might be appropriately tagged as > "opaque". > > > >
