It occurs to me that we're not really talking about 1Dimension. We're talking about 2 Dimensions, with atoms strung together "in a straight line". But the reality is that a string of atoms in a chain will not be in a straight line, more like a "virtual" straight line" of least resistance like a wire conducting electricity.
Just to be clear. This effect does not happen in 1 dimension (a point, only one atom) but more like in a "line" of atoms, more like a "chain" or "string" of atoms. That's my contention, I believe it is Ed Storms's contention as well. We've got a chain of atoms interacting with another chain of atoms. 2 Trains colliding and generating tons of heat & phonon (sound) energy and maybe some light and lost lives (nuclear reactions). On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > *More...* > > *A 1 dimensional atom strings will form a 1 dimensional superconductor. > A long thin string of hydrogen atoms will be superconducting. The process > that forms these strings is condensation from plasma. Ed Storms should have > had the courtesy to use the name of this stuff that the discoverer coined, > Rydberg matter. It keeps the confusion level down. Dr. Leif Holmlid worked > with Dr, Miley on the many experiments including the one where Dr Miley > discovered this superconductivity in hydrogen.* > > *I have always used the used the name Rydberg Matter with I judged was the > proper name to refer to these strings of hydrogen atoms. Inventing new > names for thing in LENR will just make the field increasingly confusing, > more than it already is.* > > *I will give the credit to Dr Gorge Miley and Dr. Leif Holmlid for Rydberg > matter, both the discovery and the naming of it. *Dr. Leif Holmlid > > > On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Miley has measures zero resistance in the Nano cavity that holds the >> hydrogen, So the hydrogen is superconducting. That has to be a BEC. How >> does this experimental finding impact Ed Storms theory? Has Ed included >> this dot in his collection? >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Maybe instead of metallic 1D hydrogen, it's a Vibrational 1D Luttinger >>> Liquid BEC forming. A V1DLLBEC. >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> maybe some connexions, but Hydroton is a 1D object, constrained in a >>>> lattice defect... metallic 1D hydrogen... >>>> >>>> Rydberg states is rather talking of excitation of the electrons.. >>>> maybe is rydberg state of atoms in a coherent 1D chain of metallic >>>> hydrogen... >>>> >>>> maybe is is a 1D rydberg matter... need more data >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014-07-20 21:22 GMT+02:00 Axil Axil <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> Why is the hydroton different from Rydberg hydrogen crystals(aka >>>>> matter)? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks. Good interview. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The main complaint from the non-specialists - which will insure that >>>>>> it gets few viewers - is lack of graphics. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Which is unrealistic of course, since who (especially among >>>>>> volunteers) has the resources for a graphics artist these days? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I was going to suggest looping parts of an existing video, without >>>>>> the sound, like this one >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VD4hj2PmkoY >>>>>> >>>>>> They are supposedly a for-profit company who might agree - for a >>>>>> little joint PR. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyway - If anything needs to be cleared up it is the “hydroton”. >>>>>> Everything in the Storms theory pretty much depends on this hybrid >>>>>> concept. >>>>>> It is a hypothetical “chemical structure” without any precedence in >>>>>> chemistry or physics. To me, it looks like a strained attempt to shoehorn >>>>>> Hagelstein’s ideas about lack of gammas into fractofusion, together with >>>>>> something vaguely related to Mills. Ed has expressed before that he does >>>>>> not like his concept being referred to as fractofusion…. but he has this >>>>>> love/hate thing with trying to draw the line between hot and cold fusion >>>>>> is >>>>>> a peculiar way that probably cannot be valid. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> My response is that if walks like a duck and quacks like a duck …. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, anyway - we ought to start a new thread on the hydroton when >>>>>> enough readers have gotten hold of the book. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Jones >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* Foks0904 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> For anyone who has 50 minutes and an interest in cold fusion theory. >>>>>> We discuss both Ed's theory specifically and the theory landscape >>>>>> generally >>>>>> -- and get into a number of other topics in between. Thanks for >>>>>> listening: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://coldfusionnow.org/interview-with-dr-edmund-storms-on-lenr-theory/ >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
