If a magnetic force is produced by an atomic level cause whose dimensions are nanoscale, and the intensity of the magnetic force at 20 cm is 1 tesla. By the cube law relationship, the intensity of the magnetic source as produced on the nanoscale can be reckoned as 2*10^^8 cubed or something like 8*10^^24 tesla.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > http://phys.org/news/2014-07-tiny-magnets-huge-fields-nanoscale.html#nwlt > > Doudin et al - at University of Strasbourg propose that nano ferromagnetic > electrodes can create powerful localized force fields which are tuned by an > external magnetic field. "Localized field" is a key. Inverse square power > laws can make a large difference. > > Their finding can be understood as similar to a precondition for > nanomagnetism in LENR. Of course, this paper is ostensibly not related to > LENR, so it would also be a mistake to try to read too much into it. > > One must first understand the nuances of superparamagnetism, as the gateway > to spin-coupling in LENR... then this cross-connection can become > apparent. > The authors construct nanonickel electrodes in a solution containing > paramagnetic molecules and control the electrode's magnetization direction > with an external magnetic field. In so doing, they created a conductive > molecular-sized switching system which is the chemical equivalent of a > spintronics spin valve. Spin coupling is implied. > > In LENR this molecular level switching would occur at Terahertz blackbody > rate of the thermal system, and would act as a pump for extracting spin > energy from protons, nickel atoms, or both (as magnons) - which show up as > thermal gain in a system where superparamagnetism and superferromagnetism > compete with each other. "Magnon" is another key concept for LENR. > > The high level of spin coupling to magnons is possible as a direct result > of competition between superparamagnetic and superferromagnetic particles > in > motion, and in phase change - as well as a dynamical Casimir effect at the > same geometry. > > Moving from a geometry defined by micron dimensions to nano, when magnetism > is involved, brings with it the potential for gains of 1000^2. That, in a > nutshell, is what nanomagnetism is all about. > > Jones > > And ... for the benefit of the growing "spin-coupling" "nanomagnetism" > cadre > on vortex, consider inverse cube as it relates to the Biot-Savart Law for > magnetism. The parameters for change from square to cube favor the smaller > dimensions. The Biot-Savart Law has a cubic power law denominator and > ostensibly gives an inverse cube dependence for magnetism in those > scenarios. See > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biot%E2%80%93Savart_law > >
