Dave--
My understanding is old and may be off base. However here goes. The magnetic field to which a magnetic dipole moment is subjected becomes degenerate and the quantum spin states separate in energy with the magnetic field strength. The frequency of any given state is associated with the energy of that particular quantum state. The alignment of the spin vector can be along the magnetic field alignment or anti-parallel to it. Perfect alignment does not happen and is a function of temperature. However, as temperature goes down or magnetic field strength increases, the alignment approaches zero declination for the average declination away from perfect alignment. The exact energy states are very large in number for any quantum system given the random orientation of the spin of all the particles making up the system. As the magnetic field changes the energy states must also change for most atoms. The timing of the changes is quite fast and the redistribution of energy is also fast and in small increments. However the larger the magnetic field, the larger the energy increments one would expect. Redistribution of spin energy among atoms of a system would be expected. I also remember that spin can be distributed to electronic structure--orbital, J, as well as electrons,j. The orbital spin results in thermal motion of the lattice and temperature increases. Angular momentum and spin is conserved in any transition--reaction. Bob Sent from Windows Mail From: David Roberson Sent: Friday, August 1, 2014 11:17 AM To: [email protected] Bob, you seem to have a good working knowledge of MRI devices so I have a few questions for you. Does the emission frequency of the hydrogen nucleus become tuned by the level of the external super magnetic field? How much tuning is seen during normal operation and in research? The reason I ask is that it is obvious that the energy levels would be very close together if they can be detected by variation in the RF frequencies emitted. Then one would ask how far upwards in frequency(energy quanta) does this effect translate? And finally, would you expect the spin coupling of this nature to exist at the much higher energy levels that are seen in LENR devices? It is not clear to me yet, perhaps due to some hang up, how far apart the various energy levels due to spin states are in nuclei. What would determine how close together each step would be to its neighbors? Is this a measurement determined quantity or calculated by a really good formula? Dave -----Original Message----- From: Bob Cook <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, Aug 1, 2014 2:35 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Important finding for nanomagnetism LENR Jones and Axil-- As You may guess, I tend to agree with your considerations regarding spin coupling and magnetic resonances. The intense fields at small dimensions allowed by the nano size structures is an inference that I have long held. Keep up the good discovery work. I wonder if any of the Professors at the University of Strasbourg are in the group trying to determine the theory of Rossi’s TPT? I’m heading to the University of Bologna in 6 weeks and hope to talk with the folks there about their ideas. I will report back asap. Bob Cook Sent from Windows Mail From: Axil Axil Sent: Friday, August 1, 2014 8:21 AM To: [email protected] If a magnetic force is produced by an atomic level cause whose dimensions are nanoscale, and the intensity of the magnetic force at 20 cm is 1 tesla. By the cube law relationship, the intensity of the magnetic source as produced on the nanoscale can be reckoned as 2*10^^8 cubed or something like 8*10^^24 tesla. On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: http://phys.org/news/2014-07-tiny-magnets-huge-fields-nanoscale.html#nwlt Doudin et al - at University of Strasbourg propose that nano ferromagnetic electrodes can create powerful localized force fields which are tuned by an external magnetic field. "Localized field" is a key. Inverse square power laws can make a large difference. Their finding can be understood as similar to a precondition for nanomagnetism in LENR. Of course, this paper is ostensibly not related to LENR, so it would also be a mistake to try to read too much into it. One must first understand the nuances of superparamagnetism, as the gateway to spin-coupling in LENR... then this cross-connection can become apparent. The authors construct nanonickel electrodes in a solution containing paramagnetic molecules and control the electrode's magnetization direction with an external magnetic field. In so doing, they created a conductive molecular-sized switching system which is the chemical equivalent of a spintronics spin valve. Spin coupling is implied. In LENR this molecular level switching would occur at Terahertz blackbody rate of the thermal system, and would act as a pump for extracting spin energy from protons, nickel atoms, or both (as magnons) - which show up as thermal gain in a system where superparamagnetism and superferromagnetism compete with each other. "Magnon" is another key concept for LENR. The high level of spin coupling to magnons is possible as a direct result of competition between superparamagnetic and superferromagnetic particles in motion, and in phase change - as well as a dynamical Casimir effect at the same geometry. Moving from a geometry defined by micron dimensions to nano, when magnetism is involved, brings with it the potential for gains of 1000^2. That, in a nutshell, is what nanomagnetism is all about. Jones And ... for the benefit of the growing "spin-coupling" "nanomagnetism" cadre on vortex, consider inverse cube as it relates to the Biot-Savart Law for magnetism. The parameters for change from square to cube favor the smaller dimensions. The Biot-Savart Law has a cubic power law denominator and ostensibly gives an inverse cube dependence for magnetism in those scenarios. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biot%E2%80%93Savart_law
