My theory of the reaction assumes the reaction starts in the 5 micron nickel particles at the time before the initiation of plasma formation. This powder is in a confined volume but is comprised of many nano sized sources.
So there will be some fuzziness at 20 cms when the initial magnetic field value is ,6 tesla due to the distribution in space of the 5 micron particles. Also, the magnetic strength will be divided by the number of individual sources, say 100,000,000 nanowire sources. The initial's values of the magnetic field at initiation of the plasma pulse is .6 tesla and increases to 1.6 tesla. When the plasma pulse terminates then the far field magnetic value grows to 1.6 tesla. That increase is caused by the formation of dynamic NAE that is produced in the nanoparticles aggregations that are formed by the condensation of the cooling plasma produced by the just terminated plasma pulse. This dynamic NAE source is spread out widely through the hydrogen envelope. On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:58 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil, you are assuming that the source is a tiny point. The true > dimensions are much larger since superposition of many tiny > sources contributes to the measurement. > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri, Aug 1, 2014 12:21 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Important finding for nanomagnetism LENR > > If a magnetic force is produced by an atomic level cause whose > dimensions are nanoscale, and the intensity of the magnetic force at 20 cm > is 1 tesla. By the cube law relationship, the intensity of the magnetic > source as produced on the nanoscale can be reckoned as 2*10^^8 cubed or > something like 8*10^^24 tesla. > > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> http://phys.org/news/2014-07-tiny-magnets-huge-fields-nanoscale.html#nwlt >> >> Doudin et al - at University of Strasbourg propose that nano ferromagnetic >> electrodes can create powerful localized force fields which are tuned by >> an >> external magnetic field. "Localized field" is a key. Inverse square power >> laws can make a large difference. >> >> Their finding can be understood as similar to a precondition for >> nanomagnetism in LENR. Of course, this paper is ostensibly not related to >> LENR, so it would also be a mistake to try to read too much into it. >> >> One must first understand the nuances of superparamagnetism, as the >> gateway >> to spin-coupling in LENR... then this cross-connection can become >> apparent. >> The authors construct nanonickel electrodes in a solution containing >> paramagnetic molecules and control the electrode's magnetization direction >> with an external magnetic field. In so doing, they created a conductive >> molecular-sized switching system which is the chemical equivalent of a >> spintronics spin valve. Spin coupling is implied. >> >> In LENR this molecular level switching would occur at Terahertz blackbody >> rate of the thermal system, and would act as a pump for extracting spin >> energy from protons, nickel atoms, or both (as magnons) - which show up as >> thermal gain in a system where superparamagnetism and superferromagnetism >> compete with each other. "Magnon" is another key concept for LENR. >> >> The high level of spin coupling to magnons is possible as a direct result >> of competition between superparamagnetic and superferromagnetic particles >> in >> motion, and in phase change - as well as a dynamical Casimir effect at the >> same geometry. >> >> Moving from a geometry defined by micron dimensions to nano, when >> magnetism >> is involved, brings with it the potential for gains of 1000^2. That, in a >> nutshell, is what nanomagnetism is all about. >> >> Jones >> >> And ... for the benefit of the growing "spin-coupling" "nanomagnetism" >> cadre >> on vortex, consider inverse cube as it relates to the Biot-Savart Law for >> magnetism. The parameters for change from square to cube favor the smaller >> dimensions. The Biot-Savart Law has a cubic power law denominator and >> ostensibly gives an inverse cube dependence for magnetism in those >> scenarios. See >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biot%E2%80%93Savart_law >> >> >
