Sorry, Kevin I don't understand what you don't understand see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis
For technology and management SWOT is as clear as AIDS for physician To call SWOT ridiculous is a bit strange, mo chara! Which acronym finders do not decode MY acronyms? Non capisco! I regret that you will not read my paper, however if SWOT is a scare word for you, what can I do? Peter On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Right, Kevin! The definition of SWOT is clearly given in the first >> paragraph >> of the paper- have you read it? >> > ***Nope. I stopped short at undefined acronyms and the risk of > downloading the latest virus. > > > >> In management SWOT is a standard procedure a must. >> > ***Yup. standard procedure, and typical nonsense associated with as-yet > undefined acronyms. > > > > >> Each field of knowledge has its specific jargon, including abbreviations, >> acronyms. >> > ***And yet, you're running into those who don't know your supposed jargon, > so you have no business using it. > > > >> English is poly-semantic, the words have many meanings >> > ***But Jargons and Acronyms are Mono-Symantic:BJAAAMS. GAC. GWTP. > >> >> BTW, there are fine acronym- finders on the web. >> > ***And the few I tried did not decode your acronyms. Look how far down in > this discussion we have gone without you defining your ridiculous acronym. > Why should I read your paper? > > > >> >> I have studied web-search for many years, from the old days when it was >> based on knowing the best sources and the fastest algorithms up to today >> when it's just the art of getting rid of the nasty intruding ads. >> > ***Nice to know. And yet, after all that bullshit, you still didn't > define your acronym. WSL? GWTP? FYATHYRIO. > > > > >> NALOPKT, >> Peter.. >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> There once was a reason for acronyms: lack of memory and time and >>> space. But your computer has plenty of memory, it takes only a couple of >>> seconds to push out the definition of SWOT, and there's plenty of space. >>> WTFPA? WNJPOTOWRTTFA? TANSTAAFL. GWTP. WSL? W<UNLMA???? >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear friends, >>>> >>>> I have just published; >>>> >>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/08/an-uptodated-swot-analysis-of-e-cat-for.html >>>> >>>> It is mainly about T of SWOT; many of the readers (me included) will >>>> not like everything I say here. >>>> But reality will accept it, how is possible to respect ALL the good >>>> rules in a very VUCA situation? >>>> Can you educate your children without fairy tales? >>>> >>>> Inventors have to think realistically, act pragmatically and >>>> communicate diplomatically. Let's try to understand what does this mean in >>>> this case.. >>>> >>>> Peter >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>>> Cluj, Romania >>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
