On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote:
> Kevin, then why are you using LENR? People who are illiterate in New > Energy have no idea what it is. > ***People on this list know what LENR stands for. They don't know other acronyms, such as the ones I've been pelting you with. This list is not for those who are illiterate in New Energy. > Unfortunately, 6 specialists in LENR you will ask, will tell you the same > words but will give you 7 different explanations. We are living in a VUCA > world. > ***There you go again. TYGA. > I recommend you to do a bit Fast Company reading, your acronym-phobia > can be a symptom. > ***I recommend you stop being so lazy. Stop assuming. You know what happens when you ASSUme, right? You make an ASS out of U and ME. And also, this aint a phobia of acronyms, it's a dislike. Why is it so many people downshift into politically correct bullshit and label stuff phobias? I ain't afraid of numbnuts, I just don't like them either. I ain't afraid of acronyms, I just dislike them. I aint afraid of browbeaters, I just dislike them. I will admit to islamophobia sometimes. I'm afraid of islamic fundamentalists for pretty good reasons. A large percentage of terrorist activity over the last 50 years has come from islamic fundamentalists. At any rate, we digress. And notice quite how far we have digressed, and yet you still have not expanded out your ridiculous acronym. Think about how much you have written, how much abuse you've taken over something as simple as WRITING OUT THE DANGED TEXT. Try not to be so lazy. > > Peter > > > On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> what can I do? >> ***stop engaging in such pretense. Acronyms are for when everyone agrees >> on what it stands for, otherwise YGMSOYSOTSTYB4. In such a case, BOHICA. >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Sorry, Kevin I don't understand what you don't understand >>> see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis >>> >>> For technology and management SWOT is as clear as AIDS for physician >>> To call SWOT ridiculous is a bit strange, mo chara! >>> >>> Which acronym finders do not decode MY acronyms? Non capisco! >>> >>> I regret that you will not read my paper, however if SWOT is a scare >>> word for you, what can I do? >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Right, Kevin! The definition of SWOT is clearly given in the first >>>>> paragraph >>>>> of the paper- have you read it? >>>>> >>>> ***Nope. I stopped short at undefined acronyms and the risk of >>>> downloading the latest virus. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> In management SWOT is a standard procedure a must. >>>>> >>>> ***Yup. standard procedure, and typical nonsense associated with >>>> as-yet undefined acronyms. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Each field of knowledge has its specific jargon, including >>>>> abbreviations, acronyms. >>>>> >>>> ***And yet, you're running into those who don't know your supposed >>>> jargon, so you have no business using it. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> English is poly-semantic, the words have many meanings >>>>> >>>> ***But Jargons and Acronyms are Mono-Symantic:BJAAAMS. GAC. GWTP. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> BTW, there are fine acronym- finders on the web. >>>>> >>>> ***And the few I tried did not decode your acronyms. Look how far down >>>> in this discussion we have gone without you defining your ridiculous >>>> acronym. Why should I read your paper? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I have studied web-search for many years, from the old days when it >>>>> was based on knowing the best sources and the fastest algorithms up to >>>>> today when it's just the art of getting rid of the nasty intruding ads. >>>>> >>>> ***Nice to know. And yet, after all that bullshit, you still didn't >>>> define your acronym. WSL? GWTP? FYATHYRIO. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> NALOPKT, >>>>> Peter.. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> There once was a reason for acronyms: lack of memory and time and >>>>>> space. But your computer has plenty of memory, it takes only a couple of >>>>>> seconds to push out the definition of SWOT, and there's plenty of space. >>>>>> WTFPA? WNJPOTOWRTTFA? TANSTAAFL. GWTP. WSL? W<UNLMA???? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear friends, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have just published; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/08/an-uptodated-swot-analysis-of-e-cat-for.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is mainly about T of SWOT; many of the readers (me included) will >>>>>>> not like everything I say here. >>>>>>> But reality will accept it, how is possible to respect ALL the good >>>>>>> rules in a very VUCA situation? >>>>>>> Can you educate your children without fairy tales? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Inventors have to think realistically, act pragmatically and >>>>>>> communicate diplomatically. Let's try to understand what does this mean >>>>>>> in >>>>>>> this case.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>>>>>> Cluj, Romania >>>>>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>>>> Cluj, Romania >>>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>> Cluj, Romania >>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>> >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >
