Sorry, it seems my blog has lost a reader. Wish you all we Peterll
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Peter: > > Thank you for reading my very short FQXI essay. If yours were as short as > mine, I would have read it. Perhaps even if your abstract were simple and > straightforward as mine, I would have read it. But it wasn't. > > To be candid, it suffers from the same pretentiousness you have > demonstrated in this thread. It was full of "Detailitis, Dilutitis, > Defocusitis and Defrostitis." > > By the way, workaholism can be viewed as a form of emotional laziness. > > Why are you so deeply entwined in a discussion at this point when you > could have simply defined your acronym, which is what every Technical > Writing class tells you to do? > > Let's go back to our moutons. > ***What? This appears to be a typo so destructive that I can't backtrack > on it to see what you might possibly be saying at this point. > > > > > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: > >> At 77 I am anything else but not lazy. Actually I am an workaholic. >> Humor or not Humor- we should stop this thread here, otherwise we will >> contribute to the endemic illnesses of the VORTEX forum (I am a founding >> member if it, so I know)- Detailitis, Dilutitis, Disputitis (!), >> Defocusitis and Defrostitis. Let's go back to our moutons. >> Friendly question: I have read your FQXI essay, you have read mine? >> Peter >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Kevin, then why are you using LENR? People who are illiterate in New >>>> Energy have no idea what it is. >>>> >>> ***People on this list know what LENR stands for. They don't know other >>> acronyms, such as the ones I've been pelting you with. This list is not >>> for those who are illiterate in New Energy. >>> >>> >>> >>>> Unfortunately, 6 specialists in LENR you will ask, will tell you the >>>> same words but will give you 7 different explanations. We are living in a >>>> VUCA >>>> world. >>>> >>> ***There you go again. TYGA. >>> >>> >>> >>>> I recommend you to do a bit Fast Company reading, your acronym-phobia >>>> can be a symptom. >>>> >>> ***I recommend you stop being so lazy. Stop assuming. You know what >>> happens when you ASSUme, right? You make an ASS out of U and ME. And >>> also, this aint a phobia of acronyms, it's a dislike. Why is it so many >>> people downshift into politically correct bullshit and label stuff >>> phobias? I ain't afraid of numbnuts, I just don't like them either. I >>> ain't afraid of acronyms, I just dislike them. I aint afraid of >>> browbeaters, I just dislike them. I will admit to islamophobia sometimes. >>> I'm afraid of islamic fundamentalists for pretty good reasons. A large >>> percentage of terrorist activity over the last 50 years has come from >>> islamic fundamentalists. At any rate, we digress. And notice quite how >>> far we have digressed, and yet you still have not expanded out your >>> ridiculous acronym. Think about how much you have written, how much abuse >>> you've taken over something as simple as WRITING OUT THE DANGED TEXT. Try >>> not to be so lazy. >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Peter >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> what can I do? >>>>> ***stop engaging in such pretense. Acronyms are for when everyone >>>>> agrees on what it stands for, otherwise YGMSOYSOTSTYB4. In such a case, >>>>> BOHICA. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Sorry, Kevin I don't understand what you don't understand >>>>>> see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis >>>>>> >>>>>> For technology and management SWOT is as clear as AIDS for physician >>>>>> To call SWOT ridiculous is a bit strange, mo chara! >>>>>> >>>>>> Which acronym finders do not decode MY acronyms? Non capisco! >>>>>> >>>>>> I regret that you will not read my paper, however if SWOT is a scare >>>>>> word for you, what can I do? >>>>>> >>>>>> Peter >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Right, Kevin! The definition of SWOT is clearly given in the first >>>>>>>> paragraph >>>>>>>> of the paper- have you read it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> ***Nope. I stopped short at undefined acronyms and the risk of >>>>>>> downloading the latest virus. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In management SWOT is a standard procedure a must. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> ***Yup. standard procedure, and typical nonsense associated with >>>>>>> as-yet undefined acronyms. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Each field of knowledge has its specific jargon, including >>>>>>>> abbreviations, acronyms. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> ***And yet, you're running into those who don't know your supposed >>>>>>> jargon, so you have no business using it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> English is poly-semantic, the words have many meanings >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> ***But Jargons and Acronyms are Mono-Symantic:BJAAAMS. GAC. GWTP. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BTW, there are fine acronym- finders on the web. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> ***And the few I tried did not decode your acronyms. Look how far >>>>>>> down in this discussion we have gone without you defining your >>>>>>> ridiculous >>>>>>> acronym. Why should I read your paper? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have studied web-search for many years, from the old days when it >>>>>>>> was based on knowing the best sources and the fastest algorithms up to >>>>>>>> today when it's just the art of getting rid of the nasty intruding ads. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> ***Nice to know. And yet, after all that bullshit, you still didn't >>>>>>> define your acronym. WSL? GWTP? FYATHYRIO. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> NALOPKT, >>>>>>>> Peter.. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected] >>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There once was a reason for acronyms: lack of memory and time and >>>>>>>>> space. But your computer has plenty of memory, it takes only a >>>>>>>>> couple of >>>>>>>>> seconds to push out the definition of SWOT, and there's plenty of >>>>>>>>> space. >>>>>>>>> WTFPA? WNJPOTOWRTTFA? TANSTAAFL. GWTP. WSL? W<UNLMA???? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Peter Gluck <[email protected] >>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Dear friends, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have just published; >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/08/an-uptodated-swot-analysis-of-e-cat-for.html >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It is mainly about T of SWOT; many of the readers (me included) >>>>>>>>>> will not like everything I say here. >>>>>>>>>> But reality will accept it, how is possible to respect ALL the >>>>>>>>>> good rules in a very VUCA situation? >>>>>>>>>> Can you educate your children without fairy tales? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Inventors have to think realistically, act pragmatically and >>>>>>>>>> communicate diplomatically. Let's try to understand what does this >>>>>>>>>> mean in >>>>>>>>>> this case.. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>>>>>>>>> Cluj, Romania >>>>>>>>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>>>>>>> Cluj, Romania >>>>>>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>>>>> Cluj, Romania >>>>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>>> Cluj, Romania >>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
