Thanks, I will do so - can you suggest an acronym that goes well with LENR? Peter
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:52 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > Peter, it might be helpful if you define every term when it is first used > in your document. LENR(Low Energy Nuclear Reaction) as example. > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Gluck <[email protected]> > To: VORTEX <[email protected]> > Sent: Wed, Aug 6, 2014 12:03 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]:New SWOT analysis of the E-cat > > Kevin, then why are you using LENR? People who are illiterate in New > Energy have no idea what it is. > Unfortunately, 6 specialists in LENR you will ask, will tell you the same > words but will give you 7 different explanations. We are living in a VUCA > world. > I recommend you to do a bit Fast Company reading, your acronym-phobia > can be a symptom. > > Peter > > > On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> what can I do? >> ***stop engaging in such pretense. Acronyms are for when everyone agrees >> on what it stands for, otherwise YGMSOYSOTSTYB4. In such a case, BOHICA. >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Sorry, Kevin I don't understand what you don't understand >>> see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis >>> >>> For technology and management SWOT is as clear as AIDS for physician >>> To call SWOT ridiculous is a bit strange, mo chara! >>> >>> Which acronym finders do not decode MY acronyms? Non capisco! >>> >>> I regret that you will not read my paper, however if SWOT is a scare >>> word for you, what can I do? >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Right, Kevin! The definition of SWOT is clearly given in the first >>>>> paragraph >>>>> of the paper- have you read it? >>>>> >>>> ***Nope. I stopped short at undefined acronyms and the risk of >>>> downloading the latest virus. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> In management SWOT is a standard procedure a must. >>>>> >>>> ***Yup. standard procedure, and typical nonsense associated with >>>> as-yet undefined acronyms. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Each field of knowledge has its specific jargon, including >>>>> abbreviations, acronyms. >>>>> >>>> ***And yet, you're running into those who don't know your supposed >>>> jargon, so you have no business using it. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> English is poly-semantic, the words have many meanings >>>>> >>>> ***But Jargons and Acronyms are Mono-Symantic:BJAAAMS. GAC. GWTP. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> BTW, there are fine acronym- finders on the web. >>>>> >>>> ***And the few I tried did not decode your acronyms. Look how far down >>>> in this discussion we have gone without you defining your ridiculous >>>> acronym. Why should I read your paper? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I have studied web-search for many years, from the old days when it >>>>> was based on knowing the best sources and the fastest algorithms up to >>>>> today when it's just the art of getting rid of the nasty intruding ads. >>>>> >>>> ***Nice to know. And yet, after all that bullshit, you still didn't >>>> define your acronym. WSL? GWTP? FYATHYRIO. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> NALOPKT, >>>>> Peter.. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> There once was a reason for acronyms: lack of memory and time and >>>>>> space. But your computer has plenty of memory, it takes only a couple of >>>>>> seconds to push out the definition of SWOT, and there's plenty of space. >>>>>> WTFPA? WNJPOTOWRTTFA? TANSTAAFL. GWTP. WSL? W<UNLMA???? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear friends, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have just published; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/08/an-uptodated-swot-analysis-of-e-cat-for.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is mainly about T of SWOT; many of the readers (me included) >>>>>>> will not like everything I say here. >>>>>>> But reality will accept it, how is possible to respect ALL the good >>>>>>> rules in a very VUCA situation? >>>>>>> Can you educate your children without fairy tales? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Inventors have to think realistically, act pragmatically and >>>>>>> communicate diplomatically. Let's try to understand what does this mean >>>>>>> in >>>>>>> this case.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>>>>>> Cluj, Romania >>>>>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>>>> Cluj, Romania >>>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>> Cluj, Romania >>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>> >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
