Peter, it might be helpful if you define every term when it is first used in your document. LENR(Low Energy Nuclear Reaction) as example. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Peter Gluck <[email protected]> To: VORTEX <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, Aug 6, 2014 12:03 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:New SWOT analysis of the E-cat
Kevin, then why are you using LENR? People who are illiterate in New Energy have no idea what it is. Unfortunately, 6 specialists in LENR you will ask, will tell you the same words but will give you 7 different explanations. We are living in a VUCA world. I recommend you to do a bit Fast Company reading, your acronym-phobia can be a symptom. Peter On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: what can I do? ***stop engaging in such pretense. Acronyms are for when everyone agrees on what it stands for, otherwise YGMSOYSOTSTYB4. In such a case, BOHICA. On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: Sorry, Kevin I don't understand what you don't understand see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis For technology and management SWOT is as clear as AIDS for physician To call SWOT ridiculous is a bit strange, mo chara! Which acronym finders do not decode MY acronyms? Non capisco! I regret that you will not read my paper, however if SWOT is a scare word for you, what can I do? Peter On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: Right, Kevin! The definition of SWOT is clearly given in the first paragraph of the paper- have you read it? ***Nope. I stopped short at undefined acronyms and the risk of downloading the latest virus. In management SWOT is a standard procedure a must. ***Yup. standard procedure, and typical nonsense associated with as-yet undefined acronyms. Each field of knowledge has its specific jargon, including abbreviations, acronyms. ***And yet, you're running into those who don't know your supposed jargon, so you have no business using it. English is poly-semantic, the words have many meanings ***But Jargons and Acronyms are Mono-Symantic:BJAAAMS. GAC. GWTP. BTW, there are fine acronym- finders on the web. ***And the few I tried did not decode your acronyms. Look how far down in this discussion we have gone without you defining your ridiculous acronym. Why should I read your paper? I have studied web-search for many years, from the old days when it was based on knowing the best sources and the fastest algorithms up to today when it's just the art of getting rid of the nasty intruding ads. ***Nice to know. And yet, after all that bullshit, you still didn't define your acronym. WSL? GWTP? FYATHYRIO. NALOPKT, Peter.. On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: There once was a reason for acronyms: lack of memory and time and space. But your computer has plenty of memory, it takes only a couple of seconds to push out the definition of SWOT, and there's plenty of space. WTFPA? WNJPOTOWRTTFA? TANSTAAFL. GWTP. WSL? W<UNLMA???? On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: Dear friends, I have just published; http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/08/an-uptodated-swot-analysis-of-e-cat-for.html It is mainly about T of SWOT; many of the readers (me included) will not like everything I say here. But reality will accept it, how is possible to respect ALL the good rules in a very VUCA situation? Can you educate your children without fairy tales? Inventors have to think realistically, act pragmatically and communicate diplomatically. Let's try to understand what does this mean in this case.. Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
