From: Terry Blanton
Eric Walker wrote: I have two questions that maybe someone knows the answer to: * Is Mills "predicting" a "cutoff," i.e., a broadband spectrum with a cutoff at 3.48 keV, or a sharp peak at 3.48 keV? * Is the finding in the original article a broadband spectrum with a cutoff, or a sharp peak? Either way, how does the H atom go from the accepted ground state to the 1/137 fractional state in order to emit this single photon? Is that covered in General Mills' serial? First “cutoff” is a cop-out for Mills, which essentially in hydrino-speak means that “oops, the predicted line is absent, as a line.” However, this can be due to lack of proper instrumentation. This is a very difficult spectrum to measure and any instrument, like NASA’s must be made for the purpose. In the original article, the line at 3.5 keV, like all spectral lines is a very sharp peak, so sharp as to look like a straight line - as it should found that way in Mills’ theory. However, the line which is seen in Cosmology could and probably is a true Rydberg value at higher frequency than seen, and that could tell us a lot about dark matter being maximally reduced orbitals. This probably means that the species does not reduce step-wise as Mills believes, but drops all the way to the DDL in one giant reduction. Snap, without the crackle and pop. So to speak :-) The crackle at 3.5 keV, when we account for redshift will be higher energy than seen, when red-shift is accounted for - but still a distinct line. This is an x-ray and not a gamma, as stated is some articles. Possibly the x-ray will be around 4 keV. There is a Rydberg value there. It will represent oscillation between the lowest two steps in the progression instead of real “decay,” as has been mentioned (incorrectly) and possibly and oscillation between step 135 and 136 of electron redundancy. There are reasons why step 137 is forbidden. Jones
