A summation of a possible scenario for dark matter x-ray emission. There is a good fit for the following suggestion between theory and cosmological observation:
1) Dark matter is hydrogen in the Deep Dirac Level where the electron
orbital is reduced to less than 10 Fermi. This state has been called
“virtual neutron” but real neutron formation is forbidden by Pauli
2) Mills theory suggests this happens in 137 steps
3) A better fit with observation is that the orbital reduces all the
way to DDL instantaneously and that step 137 is forbidden as it would be too
close to strong force interaction
4) The radiation seen is the result of oscillation between step 135 and
136 which are the lower two permitted steps.
5) The oscillation is most likely the result of gravity waves passing
through a cloud of dark matter.
6) The radiation initiates as 3.7 keV, a Rydberg multiple, but is
red-shifted by the dark matter gravity field and large distance - to the
3.5-3.6 keV level, which is where it is detected by satellite in Earth orbit
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------
TB: Either way, how does the H atom go from
the accepted ground state to the 1/137 fractional state in order to emit
this single photon? Is that covered in General Mills' serial?
First “cutoff” is a cop-out for Mills, which essentially in
hydrino-speak means that “oops, the predicted line is absent, as a line.”
However, this can be due to lack of proper instrumentation. This is a very
difficult spectrum to measure and any instrument, like NASA’s must be made
for the purpose.
In the original article, the line at 3.5 keV, like all
spectral lines is a very sharp peak, so sharp as to look like a straight
line - as it should found that way in Mills’ theory.
However, the line which is seen in Cosmology could and
probably is a true Rydberg value at higher frequency than seen, and that
could tell us a lot about dark matter being maximally reduced orbitals. This
probably means that the species does not reduce step-wise as Mills believes,
but drops all the way to the DDL in one giant reduction.
Snap, without the crackle and pop. So to speak :-)
The crackle at 3.5 keV, when we account for redshift will be
higher energy than seen, when red-shift is accounted for - but still a
distinct line. This is an x-ray and not a gamma, as stated is some articles.
Possibly the x-ray will be around 4 keV. There is a Rydberg
value there. It will represent oscillation between the lowest two steps in
the progression instead of real “decay,” as has been mentioned (incorrectly)
and possibly and oscillation between step 135 and 136 of electron
redundancy. There are reasons why step 137 is forbidden.
Jones
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
