Interesting information Jones. Do you plan to distribute your paper within this list when complete? It might help our understanding of the true proton mass and it's potential of being the source of LENR.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 5:36 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism From:Eric Walker Ø Thewiki article gives the proton (rest) mass as being 938.272046(21) MeV/c^2 Ø Ifthis value is accurate, at that precision I believe we have +/- 1 0.21 eV touse for free energy speculation. That isCODATA. Of course, it is no less accurate than any of the others. Unfortunately,it is no more accurate either. How can it be when quarks have variable mass? Forinstance, Jefferson Lab uses the value of 938.256 MeV.Other Labs, especially overseas have their own values. Some are measured, somecalculated, some averaged. I’m in the process of a paper on this, butI can tell you – I have high level estimates within a range, and am convincedthat there is at least 70 ppm which is in play, as excess above a median value. That can be called a narrow range, or a wide range, depending on one’smindset. The only value not in dispute in 2014 goes tothe first four digits - 938.2xx MeV … almost everything thereafter, in termsof mass variation, is in play. In fact NASA put men on the moon using a valuethat was pretty way off from what is now considered reliable. Jones
