If you take a neon sign transformer,(NST) and light a neon with it; then film that neon discharge with a digital camera, you get what you see, a constant neon discharge. The camera takes 30 pictures/sec and each picture shows the neon discharge. The camera is timed to the source 60 hz frequency input so essentially it is taking a picture every 2 cycles of the 60 hz signal, presumably during the peak of that cycle. The ferromagnetic neon transformer by common sense has the frequency output of its secondary matched to that of the primary, nothing unusual here. Now we build a different type of transformer; an air core transformer where these involve tuned circuits where the L inductor reactance is matched to an equal reactance C quantity. This occurs both on the primary and the secondary. In this regard I built such an air core resonant transformer using two seriesed 500 ft spools of 14 gauge wire,(~ 2.6 ohms); and for the secondaries placed on each polar exit volume of magnetic field of the seriesed primaries I used spools of 23 gauge wire @ 140 ohms. Because those coils are 140 ohms it is easy to find an equal reactance C value by simply plugging those quantities into the 120VAC/60hz wall outlet and finding both amperage quantities to be equal when both L and C are tested. The simple test is to put both quantities in series and first short the coil out and then short the C value out; and when the amperages of both reactance tests are closely matched this is the closest resonant combination that can be had with the components on hand. Now we of course will assume that when we test the matching reactance with the 60 hz line inputs: this same paired C quantity with that L quantity should be employed when instead the 60 hz frequency signal is acquired by air core induction instead of a direct line connection source of emf. After all the resonance is determined by the frequency input. We would scarcely suspect that the frequency between the primary and secondary could be different! So going onward now we consider how we might test those secondaries for the air core secondary case, although only an idiot would suppose that such a test need be made in the first place; since they have already been tested with the line connections themselves. Nevertheless that test cannot be made in the same manner as the first testings because once we connect the coil in a loop with their respective C value for the air core secondary induction case we have no distinction being made between whether they are placed in series or whether they are in parallel. So common sense tells us that instead we can merely connect an amperage meter in the loop and try substituting various combinations of C values paired with the L value until we find the value that yields the highest amperage. When this was done for my air core transformer case I was amazed to find a significant difference and then concluded that for resonance at least a frequency input by line connection compared to a frequency input by voltage induced through the air had different C values to be used for pairings to achieve resonance. This is getting a little off topic for the issue at hand but let me cut that thought short by saying that for 465 hz alternator input tests a single 500 ft 14 gauge coil might use 10uf for the line connection case, but only need 8uf for the airborne voltage case. Now to get to the business at hand. Einstein theory dictates that gravity will distort the space time continuum. But what about unencumbered electrically current made magnetism without a ferromagnetic constriction of amplification placed on those magnetic lines of force? We have all seen the old western movies where when the coach stage comes to a stop, the wagon wheels appear to briefly move backwards because of the camera/event interaction. Now what would happen if the camera recording the neon discharge from my air core transformer secondaries had actually distorted the time of its operation slightly from what was received on its 60 cycles per second primary input? It would output a slightly different frequency. And the 60 cycles per second camera recording the neon discharge would actually start taking pictures towards the time period when the neon bulb was at its zero voltage AC polarity change. And when we increase the magnetism the cycle time between on and off discharge pictures also changes. But our eyes themselves only see a constant discharge... What the camera sees and what our eyes see are two different events. See my comments at Magnetism Stiffens Space-Time Magnetism Stiffens Space-Time
Magnetism Stiffens Space-Time Reworked equation suggests Einstein's sheets aren't quite so rubbery View on news.sciencemag.org Preview by Yahoo 1/10% Time distortion between load and camera reference frame 1/10% Time distortion between load and camera reference frame 1/10% Time distortion between load and camera reference ... View on youtu.be Preview by Yahoo Other you tube videos showing the point of this construction to show that the internal capacity of a coil prevents it from achieving complete resonance.... MOV134.MOD MOV134.MOD View on youtu.be Preview by Yahoo MOV13a.MOD MOV13a.MOD View on youtu.be Preview by Yahoo Sincerely Harvey D Norris Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/ On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 8:10 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: It looks to me like magnetism speeds up the march of time by straitening out the curved space imposed by matter on space/time. The larger that the density of matter is, the greater is the effects of magnetism to accelerate time. Does anybody has an opinion one way or the other?
