I have posted more than once, that if the control system of the reactor keeps the reactor temperature under the sintering temperature of the nickel nanostuctures, the nickel particles will be safe.
Is that hard to understand? On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> wrote: > My friend, this is your proof???? I've studied these docs before. > > These are all speculations. No proof here. > > But In fact, I've done more than you to try replicate some of these > ideas. I've actually built a contraption for replicating some of it. Much > more than I can say for you. Please correct me if I'm wrong on this count. > > And BTW, my friend, I never pretended to be comparable to Tesla. In fact, > I am openly admitting that I am not smart enough, educated enough to > understand what you are speculating, except that I see a big problem with > your theory that you seem to be unwilling to address. Please address my > sintering, melting root problem and we can move on to the other more > esoteric parts of your theory. > > > Jojo > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]> > *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Sunday, August 17, 2014 11:53 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:JANAP 128..Kudos...the Axil Enigma > > Axil followed suit with elaborate explanations of carbon nanoparticles > causing LENR, etc. etc. > > See > > Fusion by Pseudo-Particles > > > > Part 1 > > > > http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part1.pdf > > > > Part 2 > > > > http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part2.pdf > > > > Part 3 > > > > http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part3.pdf > > See tesla's carbon button lamp in part 1. I think you are no tesla. > > > >
