Actually my friend, if the hotcat is operating the way I speculate, Rossi does not have to worry about the sintering. Since, the NAE would be floating blobs of nickel nanoparticles which may be partially melted. He needs to use "bumpy" "sea-urchin" microparticles precisely for the reason I speculate. The tips break off as nanoparticles and serve as the NAE.
The problem is with your theory. You are speculating a mechanism of nanoantennas which I am trying to point to you is not correct. Because your nanoantenna will sinter and be destroyed. Do not attempt to confuse the issue by conflating your theory with what is known about the hotcat from the Levi TIP1 report. Quite obviously, your theory is NOT how the hotcat operates so suggesting that the hotcat is "proof" of your theory and asking me to accept that your theory is how the hotcat operates is way beyond arrogant, my friend. How can you even begin to suggest a theory and then use the HotCat as proof of your theory? That absolutely boggles the mind that you would suggest that. And why would you say the nickel does not sinter? Are you still clinging to your "metaphasic shielding" explanation that the BEC is shielding the nanostructures from high temps? Jojo ----- Original Message ----- From: Axil Axil To: vortex-l Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 12:26 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:JANAP 128..Kudos...the Axil Enigma This nickel preservation question is part of the design of the Ni/H reactor as Rossi has let slip. Rossi says that his reactor is now running at 1000C He said in the past that he used bumpy microparticles. Ask Rossi why his nickel does not sinter. By the way, it does not sinter, On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> wrote: That part I understand my friend, what I don't understand is how you can even begin to claim that. Is the mouse operating at under 300C? Because that is the beginning sintering point of nickel nanoparticles. (In fact, there is reason to believe sintering occurs at temps lower than this.) But, I do not believe the mouse is operating at 300C or less; nor is the cat. Both appear to be thermally coupled and hence would be operating at at least 700C based on the Levi TIP1 report. Jojo ----- Original Message ----- From: Axil Axil To: vortex-l Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 12:08 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:JANAP 128..Kudos...the Axil Enigma I have posted more than once, that if the control system of the reactor keeps the reactor temperature under the sintering temperature of the nickel nanostuctures, the nickel particles will be safe. Is that hard to understand? On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> wrote: My friend, this is your proof???? I've studied these docs before. These are all speculations. No proof here. But In fact, I've done more than you to try replicate some of these ideas. I've actually built a contraption for replicating some of it. Much more than I can say for you. Please correct me if I'm wrong on this count. And BTW, my friend, I never pretended to be comparable to Tesla. In fact, I am openly admitting that I am not smart enough, educated enough to understand what you are speculating, except that I see a big problem with your theory that you seem to be unwilling to address. Please address my sintering, melting root problem and we can move on to the other more esoteric parts of your theory. Jojo ----- Original Message ----- From: Axil Axil To: vortex-l Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 11:53 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:JANAP 128..Kudos...the Axil Enigma Axil followed suit with elaborate explanations of carbon nanoparticles causing LENR, etc. etc. See Fusion by Pseudo-Particles Part 1 http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part1.pdf Part 2 http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part2.pdf Part 3 http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part3.pdf See tesla's carbon button lamp in part 1. I think you are no tesla.
