Jones:

Such a theory would be straightforward (but not cheap) to test.  We contact
Louis Kervran to see if he has any of those golden sample eggs still in
storage, and submit them to the intense chemical testing that would be able
to sift through whether they've got  KH*CO3 or CaCO3 in them.


On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Another wild thought on nuclear “faux-transmutation.”
>
>
>
> If a DDL can displace an inner electron of some elements (K or L shell)
> then the resultant species will possibly react chemically as if it was the
> next element to the right in the periodic table, even if there has been no
> “real” nuclear transmutation. There could be differences, but basically if
> nickel were to bind with a DDL in an inner orbital, then the resultant
> species NiH* (where H* is a DDL) would look like copper.
>
>
>
> Perhaps it would not look exactly like copper but it could be similar
> enough to fool many instruments and possibly would be copper-colored
> instead of silvery. The H* could possibly displace one electron’s average
> position in a p-orbital of an L shell and be held there magnetically. What
> are the objections to that ? (other than that it is shockingly at odds with
> the mainstream).
>
>
>
> …And lest we forget the amazing claims of Louis Kervran in biological
> transmutation, it should be noted that CaCO3 (as a transmutation product
> for chicken eggs) has a notable signature in its *3.7 keV* fluorescent
> X-ray line.
>
>
>
> The latter is possibly unrelated… if one believes in truly random
> coincidences.
>
>
>
> If it is not coincidental, then the DDL slant on this reaction (which
> basic reaction was verified by several groups) is that poultry Hens which
> are calcium deprived, as in the experiments, but had lots of potassium in
> their diets – were able to make the normal number of eggs by converting
> potassium-39 into calcium-40. This could arguably happen by a biological
> mechanism which first created a DDL.
>
>
>
> Then this DDL either fused with the K ++OR++ was merely chemically bound
> displacing an inner electron, so that it reacted chemically like calcium to
> form eggs shells. IOW there was no nuclear reaction, but the KH*CO3 acts
> exactly as if it was CaCO3 (where H* is DDL). The same spectral line from
> calcium even shows up from the substitute, which makes detection more
> difficult.
>
>
>
> Bizarre. This is not the kind of evidence which anyone would want to use
> in support of the DDL however. (unless the audience is vortex)
>
>
>
> Jones
>

Reply via email to