Maybe your sense.  No it has not been paid back to the US tax payer.

Where did I say shut it down???? I said:

"With PV prices plummeting it makes no sense to put in another albatross
like this."

 I also said it will make good movie prop.

Stop making stuff up, like "illuminati" crap.


On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> wrote:

>  It's ALREADY BUILT!!!!  In a sense, what comes out of it is FREE.  The
> 2.2 billion is already sunked down costs.  That can't be recovered.  The
> price has already been PAID, and you want to shut it down for some dumb
> birds?  Do you have a better soluition for our energy needs?
>
> So, since the primary capital was from Uncle Sam, you think that it does
> not matter?  All the more reason for us to not bow down to the Illuminati
> hyper-environmentalism depopulation agenda.
>
>
> Jojo
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* ChemE Stewart <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 20, 2014 1:34 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Solar Collectors' Avian Threat
>
> It wasn't free, it cost $2.2 billion and has high construction and
> maintenance costs. It was primarily not investors that paid for it, it was
> US taxpayers through a check from Uncle Sam that Financed it.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>  The investors invested over 2.2 billion and you're going to shut it
>> down for some dumb birds (and some desert tortoise).  Goodness, even if we
>> take the hyperbolic, ridiculous estimate of 28,000 bird kills/year - I say
>> "so what".  I can guarantee you, more than 28,000 birds/year die of natural
>> causes, like starvation, predation, disease and plain old age.
>>
>> So, we are going to give up 392MW of free electricity in exchange for
>> 28,000 stupid dumb birds.  The thing is already build and operating and
>> generating free electricity.  Let's not shut it down for some ridiculous
>> hyper-environmental Illuminati depopulation agenda.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jojo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>> *From:* ChemE Stewart <[email protected]>
>> *To:* [email protected]
>>  *Sent:* Wednesday, August 20, 2014 1:14 AM
>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Solar Collectors' Avian Threat
>>
>> It doesn't count as a bird kill if they vaporize in the air and don't
>> make it to the ground.
>>
>> Honestly, this is an f'd up system.  With PV prices plummeting it makes
>> no sense to put in another albatross like this.
>>
>> Feel proud, if you are in the US, you bought it.
>>
>> Good movie prop, Sahara 2.
>>
>> On Tuesday, August 19, 2014, Terry Blanton <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/brightsource-solar-plant-sets-birds-on-fire-as-they-fly-overhead-1.2739512
>>>
>>> Workers at a state-of-the-art solar plant in the Mojave Desert have a
>>> name for birds that fly through the concentrated beams of solar energy
>>> focused upward by the plant's 300,000 mirrors — "streamers," for the
>>> smoke plume that comes from birds that ignite in midair.
>>>
>>> Federal wildlife investigators who visited BrightSourceEnergy's
>>> Ivanpah plant last year and watched as birds burned and fell,
>>> reporting an average of one "streamer" every two minutes, are urging
>>> California officials to halt the operator's application to build a
>>> still-bigger version.
>>>
>>> The investigators want the halt until the full extent of the deaths
>>> can be assessed. Estimates per year now range from a low of about a
>>> thousand by BrightSource to 28,000 by an expert for the Center for
>>> Biological Diversity environmental group.
>>>
>>> <more>
>>>
>>> "Streamers" establishes the graphic well.
>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to