Circular motion produces acceleration and requires energy to maintain.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:36 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > At any point in space a net vector exists for both the static electric > field and steady magnetic field. This is the vector set that can be > balanced out fairly easily. Changing fields such as those due to > electromagnetic waves are a different subject. > > This is off the subject somewhat since I was referring to an ideal > environment with my original comment. The crux of what I was saying is > that it takes an accelerated charge to generate radiation. That > acceleration can readily be due to an external electric field or a magnetic > field that is directed properly. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: mixent <mix...@bigpond.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Tue, Aug 19, 2014 5:44 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism > > In reply to David Roberson's message of Mon, 18 Aug 2014 23:11:51 -0400 > (EDT): > Hi, > [snip] > > > >And, it is possible to create an opposite field to balance out that natural > >one > that is measured within a small location in space. This is done with pairs > of > coils, etc. > > > >Dave > > There isn't just a single natural field. You should read Puthoff et al. > According to them the ZPF comprises the superposition of all the fields of all > the particles in the Universe. > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
