Not necessarily. If the energy can be focused into a tight beam that
negates the inverse square law, energy pumped into a rotating particle
system can greatly amplify both the power carried by photons and the field
carried by virtual protons.

see

*Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles*


http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf




On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:44 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote:

> True, and that energy finds itself being radiated into open space.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Tue, Aug 19, 2014 6:39 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
>
>  Circular motion produces acceleration and requires energy to maintain.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:36 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>> At any point in space a net vector exists for both the static electric
>> field and steady magnetic field.  This is the vector set that can be
>> balanced out fairly easily.  Changing fields such as those due to
>> electromagnetic waves are a different subject.
>>
>> This is off the subject somewhat since I was referring to an ideal
>> environment with my original comment.  The crux of what I was saying is
>> that it takes an accelerated charge to generate radiation.  That
>> acceleration can readily be due to an external electric field or a magnetic
>> field that is directed properly.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>> From: mixent <mix...@bigpond.com>
>> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
>>  Sent: Tue, Aug 19, 2014 5:44 pm
>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism
>>
>>   In reply to  David Roberson's message of Mon, 18 Aug 2014 23:11:51 -0400 
>> (EDT):
>> Hi,
>> [snip]
>> >
>> >And, it is possible to create an opposite field to balance out that natural 
>> >one
>> that is measured within a small location in space.   This is done with pairs 
>> of
>> coils, etc.
>> >
>> >Dave
>>
>> There isn't just a single natural field. You should read Puthoff et al.
>> According to them the ZPF comprises the superposition of all the fields of 
>> all
>> the particles in the Universe.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Robin van Spaandonk
>> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to