There are nanoparticles distributed throughout the universe, even is the bleakest areas of space. Nanoparticles will support anapole magnetic formation.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:04 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > But Axil, we are talking of open space here. There is no metal nearby > for the solitons to form upon. Also, be careful when you use the word > amplify since this type of system is not over unity as far as total energy > is concerned. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Tue, Aug 19, 2014 6:54 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism > > Not necessarily. If the energy can be focused into a tight beam that > negates the inverse square law, energy pumped into a rotating particle > system can greatly amplify both the power carried by photons and the field > carried by virtual protons. > > see > > *Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic > monopoles* > > http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf > > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:44 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> True, and that energy finds itself being radiated into open space. >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> >> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tue, Aug 19, 2014 6:39 pm >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism >> >> Circular motion produces acceleration and requires energy to maintain. >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:36 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> At any point in space a net vector exists for both the static electric >>> field and steady magnetic field. This is the vector set that can be >>> balanced out fairly easily. Changing fields such as those due to >>> electromagnetic waves are a different subject. >>> >>> This is off the subject somewhat since I was referring to an ideal >>> environment with my original comment. The crux of what I was saying is >>> that it takes an accelerated charge to generate radiation. That >>> acceleration can readily be due to an external electric field or a magnetic >>> field that is directed properly. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: mixent <[email protected]> >>> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Tue, Aug 19, 2014 5:44 pm >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism >>> >>> In reply to David Roberson's message of Mon, 18 Aug 2014 23:11:51 -0400 >>> (EDT): >>> Hi, >>> [snip] >>> > >>> >And, it is possible to create an opposite field to balance out that >>> >natural one >>> that is measured within a small location in space. This is done with >>> pairs of >>> coils, etc. >>> > >>> >Dave >>> >>> There isn't just a single natural field. You should read Puthoff et al. >>> According to them the ZPF comprises the superposition of all the fields of >>> all >>> the particles in the Universe. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Robin van Spaandonk >>> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >>> >>> >> >
