The forces involved in LENR will disrupt the orbits of electrons and therefore will make spin coupling unlikely.
On the way to a fusion event, at some point, all the electrons orbiting the nucleus will be striped and just the nuclei will participate in the fusion reaction remain. I believe in an energetic fusion reaction in which all the electrons that were orbiting the associated nuclei are displaced at a distance from the reaction. Furthermore, there is a intense resonant dipole motion that powers the fusion event and that underpins and is inherent to a energetic fusion event. The orbiting electrons cannot transfer there angular momentum to the nucleus because their orbits have been totally disrupted. Most electrons disappear; they have been converted into bosons by entanglement with photons and reside in polariton solitons. On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:27 AM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil-- > > You have stated: > > <<<<"IMHO, all fusing nuclei input to the LENR reaction must have zero > spin. > > <<<<All isotopes of Cu have non zero spins and therefore are non reactive > in LENR fusion. Cu will produce RF as being NMR active." > > Why do you think non-zero spin isotopes of Ni and Cu are LENR inactive > and/or fusing nuclei input to the LENR reaction must have zero spin.? > > I think that if spin coupling occurs, spin and its angular momentum can be > swapped among all coupled particles. However, it must be conserved IMHO. > I can imagine that 2 Ni isotopes of Ni could change the sign of their spin > in a magnetic field and pair up as a Cooper pair, much like electrons and > protons pair up with spin in opposite directions. The net spin and angular > momentum would be zero. Such a pair may react readily with other paired > particles, for example, paired H or D particles. LENR is not fully > understood yet. > > Bob > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]> > *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 10, 2014 12:07 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Rossi on Ni62 > > Ni61 has be found to be LENR inactive due to its non zero nuclear spin. > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Eric-- >> >> Whoever wrote the Wikipedia item you reference does not appear to >> understand the difference between spin of 3/2+ and 3/2-. The statement >> about the spin of Ni-61 is incorrect. >> >> >> Bob >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Eric Walker <[email protected]> >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 09, 2014 11:30 PM >> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Rossi on Ni62 >> >> I wrote: >> >> About the beta-delayed gamma -- it's not clear that the 63Ni* gamma >>> decay is a beta-delayed gamma in this instance (see the decay in [1]). But >>> as you know beta-delayed gammas are a frequent occurrence. The half-life >>> of the beta decay in this case is 100 years, so if there is beta-delayed >>> gamma emission, the activity would be significant. >>> >> >> The excited state after a beta- decay would be in the daughter (63Cu) not >> the parent (63Ni). I don't see any evidence for a 63Cu* excited state. >> You are probably right. Embarrassing rookie error on my part. >> >> Eric >> >> >
