it remind me the observation of Iwamura as noticed in the book of Ed Storms, that transmutation seems to be the fusion with an even number of deuteron (2-4-6), with preference to stable isotopes.
following the hydroton theory, NiH transmutation should be even number of protons with preference to stable isotope... question on hydroton theory is whether the transmutation is d+X+d ->Y or d+d->alpha alpha+X->Y or even for 6d fusion d+d+d+X+d+d+d -> Z (a very collective event, maybe more probable because X is heavy compared to 6d) many speculation to check with experiments. another idea of ed storms is that the 2d/4d/6d option is based on 3 dimension of space, that could allow fusion with deuterons/protons pairs from 3 independent hydroton which cross on an impurity heavy element... strange ... the reason the branching ratio is not like free space is probably because the reaction is geometrically constrained... I bet on nd+X+nd with the feeling that it is based on collective behavior, coherence and geometry. Maybe that is naive idea based on my competences, but I feel quantum mechanics more like cavity resonance than like billiard. Geometry is important. 2014-09-10 3:26 GMT+02:00 Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>: > Piantelli showed that a diproton fuses with Ni62 and produces Cu with a > emission of a protons carrying 6 Mev of energy. > > IMHO, all fusion occurs with a diproton with zero spin. > > Helium-2 or 2He, also known as a *diproton*, is an extremely unstable > isotope of helium that consists of two protons without any neutrons > > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> I wonder if the new Cu is Cu-63? Rossi may be implying that Ni-62 goes >> to Cu-63, both of which are stable isotopes. Spin coupling to get rid of >> the 6.22Mev of excess mass may be the answer--there are no gammas >> apparently. >> >> Bob >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Fletcher" <a...@well.com> >> To: "vortex-l" <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 5:37 PM >> Subject: [Vo]:Rossi on Ni62 >> >> >> >> (Sorry if this was already posted -- my internets have been intermittent ) >> >> >> Andrea Rossi >> August 28th, 2014 at 6:38 AM >> >> Curiosone: >> >> We think that our process, the so called “Rossi Effect”, is , as a >> serendipity, also a system to produce 62Ni, because only this fact can >> explain the formation of atoms of stable Cu, even if in very small amounts; >> we also noticed that using eventually powders of Ni enriched this way, the >> efficiency of the E-Cats increases. But we are not sure of this fact, >> because there may have been errors in the analysis, so we are studying , as >> a side effect , this phenomenon. Obviously, I cannot add information >> regarding this issue, pending the patents relative to it. >> Warm Regards, >> A.R. >> >> >> >
