The Reference to Neutron production is telling.
This gives an area to research for others and a clue as to the process, eg
one that is capable of producing Neutrons of an energy n.

Neutron decay is: n0 → p+ + e− + νe.

p and e could be the more important energy producers in LENR!

What energy such Neutrons have and where they decay would be a significant
proportion of the energy in the reaction; depending on the process that
creates such supposed Neutrons.

MFMP had gamma bursts in their experiments and that has been reliably
repeated both by them selves and other labs. For some time I have thought
they were the equivalent of a car back firing that poisons the LENR and
that for the reaction to be stable that it had to be prevented as well as
for possible health reasons.

If the Neutrons are literally Low Energy Neutrons then if the decay with
the reaction chamber, and I am talking nanometres here, then they sustain
the reaction if they are higher energy they spit out beyond the reaction
then we see the classic gamma burst from Neutron decay outside the reactor
and such Neutrons don't feed the reaction.

Now bear in mind that in such a reaction, Neutrons would probably be a bell
curve of energies, some supporting the reaction other Neutrons exiting the
reactor proper yet others decaying destructively to the LENR within
reaction chamber THEN obtaining fine control of that Neutron energy is a
goldilocks reaction! The porridge can be too HOT or too COLD but if it is
just right the reaction maintains it self.

Such a process of where the Neutrons decay would explain why LENR has been
so hard to replicate reliably and Rossi's secret catalyst is an addition
that catalyses and decays the neutron at the correct JUST RIGHT goldilocks
level.

On 18 September 2014 06:05, Eric Walker <[email protected]> wrote:

> Speaking of grasping for every little straw, there was an interesting post
> at E-Cat World:
>
> http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/09/17/e-cat-rumor-from-a/
>
> Congratulations go to Frank Acland for making this an indispensable site
> for news.
>
> Eric
>
>

Reply via email to