> Multiple reaction pathways are taking place in one system (a cocktail of > sorts). As a result, we see perpetual conflation of the "F&P Heat Effect" > (aka radiationless cold fusion) w/ whatever unusual hot fusion effect is > being produced (i.e. like Axil linking LeClair's work to cold fusion, which > is totally off-base, unless one is ready, at this early juncture, to adopt > wholesale his hyper-speculative "whispering quantum hall magic gamma > shield" hypothesis), perhaps by small-scale fracto-fusion, Casimir > forces, & cavitation, when conditions are right, and so on. That's just > spit-balling though, because as we know the neutron-to-tritium ratio is not > reflective of known hot fusion reactions in the slightest, so whatever is > producing the tritium has got to be a strange reaction pathway as well, > because its certainly not commensurate with the excess heat either. This is > one of those "mysteries" that I have seen no theory adequately answer as of > yet. Storms made a good go of it in his recent book (at the very least he > recognizes and advertises this enigma) but we'll have to await reliable ash > data from NiH before any reliable conclusions can be drawn. >
Like spin, the cause of LENR is not symmetric; magnetic Anatole field projection has a definite direction. The way in which the magnetic projectors are configured has determining effect to what LENR reaction occurs. For example, the Peterson cell produces gamma and a unique transmutation ash foot print where heavy metals predominate.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MiXH4r-8iA What the NAE produces is based on the geometry that the NAE assumes and the primary directions that the anapole field is pointed. Densely packed NAE in a metal lattice will produce lots of heavy metals. A dilute NAE distribution (DGT) will produce light elements like boron, lithium, and beryllium. Gamma radiation mitigation must be engineered into the system as both DGT and Rossi have done.
