It is interesting to consider the higher COP. I went back and read Rossi & Forcadi's original article, which is astounding in the level of energy production and COP. The most impressive result to me was .2 watts in and 83 watts out. It would be hard to make an error of that magnitude even with poor instrumentation. Or how about 5.1 watts in and 1006.5 watts out!
Hopefully, Rossi's team took the brakes off of the E-cat, and we see some very high out/in ratios in TPR2. Would the skeptics be convinced with 10 watts in and 2000 watts out? ;) http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=62 On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Ian Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm... Lithium > > Hmm... Graphite and Beryllium or maybe a Hydrocarbon. > > Moderation may well be the key and granular size and percentage in the mix. > > > On 18 September 2014 09:43, Ian Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hmm... Boron. >> >> >> On 18 September 2014 09:32, Ian Walker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The Reference to Neutron production is telling. >>> This gives an area to research for others and a clue as to the process, >>> eg one that is capable of producing Neutrons of an energy n. >>> >>> Neutron decay is: n0 → p+ + e− + νe. >>> >>> p and e could be the more important energy producers in LENR! >>> >>> What energy such Neutrons have and where they decay would be a >>> significant proportion of the energy in the reaction; depending on the >>> process that creates such supposed Neutrons. >>> >>> MFMP had gamma bursts in their experiments and that has been reliably >>> repeated both by them selves and other labs. For some time I have thought >>> they were the equivalent of a car back firing that poisons the LENR and >>> that for the reaction to be stable that it had to be prevented as well as >>> for possible health reasons. >>> >>> If the Neutrons are literally Low Energy Neutrons then if the decay with >>> the reaction chamber, and I am talking nanometres here, then they sustain >>> the reaction if they are higher energy they spit out beyond the reaction >>> then we see the classic gamma burst from Neutron decay outside the reactor >>> and such Neutrons don't feed the reaction. >>> >>> Now bear in mind that in such a reaction, Neutrons would probably be a >>> bell curve of energies, some supporting the reaction other Neutrons exiting >>> the reactor proper yet others decaying destructively to the LENR within >>> reaction chamber THEN obtaining fine control of that Neutron energy is a >>> goldilocks reaction! The porridge can be too HOT or too COLD but if it is >>> just right the reaction maintains it self. >>> >>> Such a process of where the Neutrons decay would explain why LENR has >>> been so hard to replicate reliably and Rossi's secret catalyst is an >>> addition that catalyses and decays the neutron at the correct JUST RIGHT >>> goldilocks level. >>> >>> On 18 September 2014 06:05, Eric Walker <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Speaking of grasping for every little straw, there was an interesting >>>> post at E-Cat World: >>>> >>>> http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/09/17/e-cat-rumor-from-a/ >>>> >>>> Congratulations go to Frank Acland for making this an indispensable >>>> site for news. >>>> >>>> Eric >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
