The XUV wavelength will fit nicely inside the circumference of a 2 or 3 nanometer diameter SPP soliton whispering gallery wave formed at the tip of the nickel nanowire(tubules in Rossi-speak)). XUV is formed as FANO resonance refabricates and reformates gamma and infrared wavelengths through destructive interference.
What Mills sees (10 nm emissions) are the same thing that Rossi is producing in the SPP solitons at the tips of his nickel tubules, This 10 nm light is also produced in sonoluminescence. There is only one process going on throughout LENR including what Mills is doing. On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > The ironic thing about the Rossi effect, in terms of the Theories and > Hypotheses which are floating around in alternative energy (from those who > are not convinced that anyone really understands it), is that the radiation > band which is apparently absent for Rossi is ultraviolet - UV and EUV. In > the Mills reaction, all the gain starts in the form of UV. This is quite a > contrast. But the reality of the situation could be far more complicated > > With Rossi, the driver of the reaction is either proton capture, as Focardi > taught him to believe, transmuting nickel to copper. Or else for others, > there could be a contribution of DDL (dense hydrogen) formation which does > not necessarily lead to nuclear fusion, or a little of both. And half a > dozen other hypothetical contributors, in between. > > Essentially, this could mean that the Rossi effect and the Mills hydrino > effect, despite both of them being possible with the same reactants - are > fundamentally different at the core. That should be no surprise, since P&F > cold fusion is fundamentally different from either Rossi or Mills, which is > very likely to be the case. > > To complicate things even more, there will be significant overlap between > all of them. Perhaps it is impossible to have a pure hydrino reaction, a > pure cold fusion reaction or a pure Rossi reaction, and now there is a > fourth category - Mizuno. But in actuality any experiment is very likely to > be a mix of some of them or all of them. > > For instance, Mills may be seeing 80% of item 3) below, and 20% of 4) which > he ignores. In effect: there are four or more major categories of LENR > which > intermix. With minor categories, there are at least a dozen. > > 1) Cold fusion of deuterium in palladium, with helium as the ash > 2) The much more robust version of Mizuno, without palladium, with > nickel as the host, where deuterium disappears and no helium is seen. > Instead, the ash is mass-2. > 3) The hydrino reaction of Mills/BLP which is claimed to be > non-nuclear > but with copious UV emission and no transmutation > 4) The Rossi effect, which is claimed to be nuclear. > 4a) Focardi's version where nickel (Ni62) transmutes to > copper > 4b) An alternative version involving dense hydrogen, which > then proceeds to copper. > 4c) An alternative version which is non-fusion, no > transmutation, no UV, Mossbauer-like RF > 4d) An alternative version involving DDL where Ni58 > transmutes to Ni60, no copper > > And several more major categories, the point being that in > any particular experiment, results may be slanted or weighted in such a way > that the experimenter sees what he wants to see. But in the case of Rossi, > he may be seeing gain from each avenue above except cold fusion ! (assuming > his hydrogen source contains some deuterium). > > > > > > >
