The wire is not in the reactor, it is embedded in the insulating alumina shell
On Wednesday, October 15, 2014, Robert Lynn <[email protected]> wrote: > Not lying, but perhaps again confirmation bias, based on wrong assumptions. > > How can the inconel wire in Fig 12b be hotter/brighter in the cooler > external environment outside the end of the reactor than it is in the > hotter internal environment inside the reactor? > > On 15 October 2014 21:12, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> They specifically say in the report the coils are the dark areas. I >> doubt they're lying about that. >> >> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> *From:* ChemE Stewart >>> >>> >>> >>> If you zoom in very closely on the hot reactor photos you can see the >>> the dark lines are of uniform width, continuity and shade. >>> >>> >>> >>> If this is 3-phase 50-cycle, then the photo should be showing the gap of >>> the odd phase at any instant, which gap moves in one direction or the >>> other, which is the marquee-effect of 3-phase (effective directionality). >>> Thus one expects non-uniform width and continuity of the conductors … this >>> is really 3-phase, no? >>> >> >> >
