Since they are measuring the input energy to the wire that makes no sense

On Wednesday, October 15, 2014, Robert Lynn <[email protected]>
wrote:

> the resistor wire expands with respect to the alumina as it heats up,
> breaking any bonding contact, or lifting the wire of the inner alumina tube
> in more and more places and leading to less and less conductive contact -
> prompting the wire to heat up as more as more of the energy it transmits to
> the reactor must be via radiation and conduction through gas rather than
> contact-conduction.  This is the likely what makes it appear that there is
> a gain above 1.
>
> On 16 October 2014 01:13, Alan Fletcher <[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>
>> New version with embedded wires.
>>
>> http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_hotcat_oct2014_141014b.php
>>
>> Here I've also assumed that the wires are a simple single strand, rather
>> than the spiral form used in the earlier tests, and are in good thermal
>> contact with the Alumina.
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to