Dave, I like the idea of a triply wound helix, but I will have to think
about whether it would provide the same kind of conveyor moving field - it
may.  It would solve the cross-over issues of the coils.  It is the
non-axial components of the field that would seem to be at play in both
cases - triple helix or three successive axial coils.

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:29 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Bob, there may be a need for the type of behavior that you are
> describing, but I am looking for the simplest explanation.  I plead
> ignorant to your description of an issue with the wires crossing over in
> some manner.  In my imagination, I can see all three wires spiriling around
> in parallel without any cross overs.  Perhaps I need to construct a model
> before I can get an accurate understanding of how this occurs.  Have you
> performed that task?
>
> It appears to me that each resistor wire is terminated into a single
> external wire and I fail to see why that would be difficult to do.  My
> visualization might be impaired!
>
> Dave
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Higgins <[email protected]>
> To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thu, Oct 16, 2014 12:41 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:temperature of the resistor wire.
>
>  Dave, that was my first thought too, but in going over the construction
> of the heater coils, it turned out to be a pain to deal with the heater
> wire cross-overs.  You would not do this just because you were planning to
> connect the array to a 3-phase supply.  You could simply have an array of
> 3N, have single phase coils, and balance each phase with the single phase
> coils in the array device.  To go to the trouble of making each unit
> 3-phase demands a better reason.  I posted earlier that I believe that the
> 3-phase is specifically used to create a linear moving field (like a linear
> motor) to circulate the lithium plasma that likely forms at high
> temperature.  This would make the device much more uniformly heated in the
> face of chaotic LENR occurring inside the reactor and would help avoid hot
> spots.
>
>  Bob
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:13 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> The three phase connection is not too surprising if we assume that many
>> more of these units are to be mounted in a complete system.  It would be
>> extra work for Rossi to construct a new device using only one phase for the
>> scientists to measure.  I give him a pass on this point.
>>
>

Reply via email to