I can't believe that the independent science team could ever make a mistake that bad: measuring a reactor temperature that as actually at 700C as being 1400C.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > There was a directly observable miracle that showed unmelted nano >> structure on the surface of those nickel micro particles that should have >> melted at 1000C and yet where photographed after days of 1400C reactor >> operating temperatures. Those temperature differences are TOO LARGE to be >> due to poor experimental measurement or technique. >> > > Your imagery is vivid, but you've assumed that the experiment actually ran > at 1400C. This is one of the questions that is up for debate. > Misdirection is not yet established given what we know. > > Eric > >
