Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: I can't believe that the independent science team could ever make a mistake > that bad: measuring a reactor temperature that as actually at 700C as being > 1400C. >
It is difficult to believe. And yet, people do make large mistakes at times. If the photos in Fig. 12 were taken when the instrument indicated a temperature of 1400 deg C then there is no doubt they made a giant mistake. The reactor surface could only be around 700 or 800 deg C with that color. If they think it was 1400 deg C they are incompetent. We need to see if they will address this and the other questions at lenr-forum.com: http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/722-Ask-questions-to-the-Working-Group-ECAT-long-term-test Assuming this is a problem: such a large discrepancy seems more like an error than an attempt to deceive, but it is hard to judge. Another reason this seems unlikely to me is that a gram of material producing 2 kW should surely have melted or vaporized. It is not the reactor as whole that would produce that heat; it is the Ni powder. I doubt it. - Jed
