Dave and Axil, On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
> I can't believe that the independent science team could ever make a > mistake that bad: measuring a reactor temperature that as actually at 700C > as being 1400C. > > Ordinarily a surface at 1400C should glow visibly white but in this case the visible glow is red. If the power output is the same as that associated with a 1400C surface then the missing energy might be in the form of extra UV emissions. Harry > On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> There was a directly observable miracle that showed unmelted nano >>> structure on the surface of those nickel micro particles that should have >>> melted at 1000C and yet where photographed after days of 1400C reactor >>> operating temperatures. Those temperature differences are TOO LARGE to be >>> due to poor experimental measurement or technique. >>> >> >> Your imagery is vivid, but you've assumed that the experiment actually >> ran at 1400C. This is one of the questions that is up for debate. >> Misdirection is not yet established given what we know. >> >> Eric >> >> >
