Rossi responds to the claim that "the color of the alumina at 1300°C is white heat” by saying: "stupidity, Alumina becomes white heat only when it melts at 2070°C and compare it to the glass is an elementary mistake"
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=853&cpage=14#comment-1013594 - Brad On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > My interest in the EMF characterization of the Ecat is a theoretical one, > not a safety issue (unless the EMF issues involves huge and disruptive > anomalies) > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Axil-- >> >> Regarding you concern about the Hot Cat EMF, Rossi in August noted the >> following: >> >> >>>>The external surface of the Hot-Cat is electrically insulated, for >> >>>> obvious safety reasons. >> Currents are out of the reaction but inside the Hot Cat. >> If you touch any external part of the Hot Cat you do not feel any current >> nor measure any electromagnetic emission. >> Warm Regards >> A.R. >>>>>>>>> >> >> Bob >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Axil Axil >> To: vortex-l >> Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 4:04 PM >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Color Temperature >> >> There are types of magnetic EMF that cannot be shielded. Furthermore, if >> large amounts of electrons are being produced as a reaction byproduct, their >> chaotic interaction with the directly connected sensors and connectors may >> not be predictable over time. >> >> There may be an agreement in place between Rossi and the testers to keep >> this EMF based behavior of the Rossi reactor confidential to protect >> Industrial Heat's intellectual property claims. >> >> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Axil-- >>> >>> From my experience, I would doubt that is a major concern for these >>> simple thermocouples. It there were a 50,000 watt antenna near by you might >>> get a pick up which could be detected in the voltage output of the >>> thermocouple. However, the external leads of a T/C are generally in a metal >>> sheath and insulated from each other by a potting compound or other >>> insulating material. The sheath would tend to shield the leads from RF >>> (RG?) radiation. >>> >>> Axil, I think your concern is unfounded. >>> >>> Bob >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Axil Axil >>> To: vortex-l >>> Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 3:33 PM >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Color Temperature >>> >>> Any directly connected sensor may be unreliable and erratic because of >>> the production of intense RG radiation especially in a reactor without RF >>> shielding. >>> >>> The only way to get good temperature data is through remote sensing, >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> From: Jed Rothwell >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The discussion of color and temperature only mask the glaring reality >>>> that >>>> an inexpensive way to be certain of thermal gain in the TP2 device is >>>> flow >>>> calorimetry. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I think flow calorimetry with this device at these temperatures would be >>>> problematic. For one thing, you could not see the device, which might even >>>> be dangerous. I think the present method is better, although it may not >>>> have >>>> been done right. It should be confirmed with the internal thermocouples. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Well, catch-22 they used an internal thermocouple - and apparently took >>>> data from a perfect location, which could “see” down the axis of the tube, >>>> presumably the hottest place in the system, but chose not to release the >>>> data. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> What excuse can they have - other than the thermocouple data does not >>>> support the thermography (therefore the thermocouple failed)? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Ahern proposed a calorimeter which would not compromise the integrity of >>>> the ceramic tube. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jones >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
