Erratum

The fact that two of the biggest ideas in modern physics are logically
incompatible just goes to show that despite what modern physicists claim
they don't give a damn about logical consistency.

Harry


On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 10:46 PM, H Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The fact that two of biggest ideas in modern physics are logically
> incompatible just goes to show that despite what modern physicists claim
> they don't give a damn about logically inconsistency.
>
> Harry
>
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Wow. TYVM
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 12:37 PM, H Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> ​Energy is not conserved​
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2010/02/22/energy-is-not-conserved/
>>>
>>> ​quote ​
>>>
>>> <<I like to think that, if I were not a professional cosmologist, I
>>> would still find it hard to believe that hundreds of cosmologists around
>>> the world have latched on to an idea that violates a bedrock principle of
>>> physics, simply because they “forgot” it. If the idea of dark energy were
>>> in conflict with some other much more fundamental principle, I suspect the
>>> theory would be a lot less popular.
>>>
>>> But many people have just this reaction. It’s clear that cosmologists
>>> have not done a very good job of spreading the word about something that’s
>>> been well-understood since at least the 1920′s: energy is not conserved in
>>> general relativity. (With caveats to be explained below.)
>>>
>>> The point is pretty simple: back when you thought energy was conserved,
>>> there was areason why you thought that, namely time-translation invariance.
>>> A fancy way of saying “the background on which particles and forces evolve,
>>> as well as the dynamical rules governing their motions, are fixed, not
>>> changing with time.” But in general relativity that’s simply no longer
>>> true. Einstein tells us that space and time are dynamical, and in
>>> particular that they can evolve with time. *When the space through
>>> which particles move is changing, the total energy of those particles is
>>> not conserved*.
>>> ​>>​
>>>
>>> Harry
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to